Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Oscar Martinez-Bernal, Mario Cavero-Vidal, Francesco Grella, Carol Martinez·· 10 days agoEditorial score63

A Minimal Optical-Flow Representation for Vision-Based Tactile Rotation Classification in Robotic Manipulation Across Gravity Domains

A Minimal Optical-Flow Representation for Vision-Based Tactile Rotation Classification in Robotic Manipulation Across Gravity Domains

Summary

This paper investigates the use of a compact optical-flow representation for classifying object rotation in robotic manipulation across different gravity conditions. Using simulated GelSight Mini data, the study shows that gravity-induced shifts in tactile features affect model performance, with Earth-trained models achieving only 75.9% accuracy in orbital conditions. A model trained across all four gravity domains achieves 96.3% overall accuracy, highlighting the need to account for domain shifts during training.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • feature count

    126

    View original evidence
    ted over a 7x9 grid into 126 features and used to classify the direction of load-induced rotation under Earth, Mars, Moon, and orbital gravity. Gravity causes a small but significant shift in these features, accounting for 1.6% of their variance (R2 = 0.016). Despite its small magnitude, this shift affects models trained only on Earth data: XGBoost accuracy decreases from 94.4% on Earth to 75.9% in orbit. In contrast
    Open source S3
  • Reported accuracy

    94.4%

    View original evidence
    ted over a 7x9 grid into 126 features and used to classify the direction of load-induced rotation under Earth, Mars, Moon, and orbital gravity. Gravity causes a small but significant shift in these features, accounting for 1.6% of their variance (R2 = 0.016). Despite its small magnitude, this shift affects models trained only on Earth data: XGBoost accuracy decreases from 94.4% on Earth to 75.9% in orbit. In contrast
    Open source S3
  • Reported accuracy

    75.9%

    View original evidence
    ted over a 7x9 grid into 126 features and used to classify the direction of load-induced rotation under Earth, Mars, Moon, and orbital gravity. Gravity causes a small but significant shift in these features, accounting for 1.6% of their variance (R2 = 0.016). Despite its small magnitude, this shift affects models trained only on Earth data: XGBoost accuracy decreases from 94.4% on Earth to 75.9% in orbit. In contrast
    Open source S3
  • Reported accuracy

    95.7%

    View original evidence
    , a single model trained across all four gravity domains achieves 96.3% overall accuracy and 95.1%-97.0% across individual domains, without using gravity as an input. The representation can also be reduced to 40 features while retaining 95.7% accuracy, with XGBoost requiring only 0.14 ms per inference. These findings show that Earth-gravity performance alone is insufficient to establish the transferability of tactile
    Open source S4
  • inference time for XGBoost

    0.14

    View original evidence
    , a single model trained across all four gravity domains achieves 96.3% overall accuracy and 95.1%-97.0% across individual domains, without using gravity as an input. The representation can also be reduced to 40 features while retaining 95.7% accuracy, with XGBoost requiring only 0.14 ms per inference. These findings show that Earth-gravity performance alone is insufficient to establish the transferability of tactile
    Open source S4
  • Reported accuracy

    95.1%

    View original evidence
    , a single model trained across all four gravity domains achieves 96.3% overall accuracy and 95.1%-97.0% across individual domains, without using gravity as an input. The representation can also be reduced to 40 features while retaining 95.7% accuracy, with XGBoost requiring only 0.14 ms per inference. These findings show that Earth-gravity performance alone is insufficient to establish the transferability of tactile
    Open source S4
  • paper: not_reported
  • code: not_reported
  • weights: not_reported
  • dataset: not_reported

What remains unknown

Not established in the collected evidence: Environment, Control, Data origin.

Reported performance applies to the described task. It does not establish general autonomy or deployment readiness.

Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

ted over a 7x9 grid into 126 features and used to classify the direction of load-induced rotation under Earth, Mars, Moon, and orbital gravity. Gravity causes a small but significant shift in these features, accounting for 1.6% of their variance (R2 = 0.016). Despite its small magnitude, this shift affects models trained only on Earth data: XGBoost accuracy decreases from 94.4% on Earth to 75.9% in orbit. In contrast

Open source S3

, a single model trained across all four gravity domains achieves 96.3% overall accuracy and 95.1%-97.0% across individual domains, without using gravity as an input. The representation can also be reduced to 40 features while retaining 95.7% accuracy, with XGBoost requiring only 0.14 ms per inference. These findings show that Earth-gravity performance alone is insufficient to establish the transferability of tactile

Open source S4

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).