Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Nikola Raicevic, Hyomuk Kim, Shahid Mulla, Hyungjun Doh, Bharath Raam Radhakrishnan, Chenbin Yu, Ki Myung Brian Lee, Nikolay Atanasov·· 3 days agoSignalEditorial score75

Closed-Loop Object-Informed Control for Non-Prehensile Robot Manipulation

Closed-Loop Object-Informed Control for Non-Prehensile Robot Manipulation

Summary

This research presents a closed-loop object-informed (CLOI) method for non-prehensile robot manipulation, addressing challenges in long-horizon planning with discontinuous contact. By splitting the problem into object-level and robot-level planning solved via model predictive path integral control and coupled through consensus using ADMM, CLOI achieves a 35% success rate increase in simulation and 43% on hardware for planar pushing tasks with obstacles compared to standard MPPI under the same computational budget.

Editorial context

The paper introduces a closed-loop object-informed control method that splits planning into object-level and robot-level subproblems solved via model predictive path integral control, achieving a 35% success rate increase in simulation and 43% on hardware for planar pushing tasks with obstacles compared to standard MPPI.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Environment
SimulationOpen source S4

Reported numbers

  • Reported success rate

    35%

    View original evidence
    s revised toward robot-realizable object trajectories, while the robot plan is aligned with the object poses the task requires. In planar pushing tasks with obstacles using an xArm6 manipulator, CLOI increases the success rate by 35% in simulation and 43% on hardware, compared to standard MPPI given the same computational budget.
    Open source S4
  • Reported success rate

    43%

    View original evidence
    s revised toward robot-realizable object trajectories, while the robot plan is aligned with the object poses the task requires. In planar pushing tasks with obstacles using an xArm6 manipulator, CLOI increases the success rate by 35% in simulation and 43% on hardware, compared to standard MPPI given the same computational budget.
    Open source S4
  • paper: not_reported

What remains unknown

Not established in the collected evidence: Control, Data origin.

Reported performance applies to the described task. It does not establish general autonomy or deployment readiness.

Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

s revised toward robot-realizable object trajectories, while the robot plan is aligned with the object poses the task requires. In planar pushing tasks with obstacles using an xArm6 manipulator, CLOI increases the success rate by 35% in simulation and 43% on hardware, compared to standard MPPI given the same computational budget.

Open source S4

arXiv:2605.30778v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Non-prehensile robot manipulation is challenging due to discontinuous, long-horizon interactions between the robot and the objects it manipulates. Sampling-based model predictive control methods are effective with discontinuous contact but face challenges with finding promising trajectories in long-horizon planning. We propose a closed-loop object-informed (CLOI) me

Open source S2

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).