Cut a Wall, See a Wall: Identity Substitution in Occluded Point-Cloud Perception for Construction Robots
Cut a Wall, See a Wall: Identity Substitution in Occluded Point-Cloud Perception for Construction Robots
This research addresses the challenge of point-cloud segmentation for construction robots in occluded environments. The study reveals that when entire regions are occluded during testing, segmentation networks mislabel these areas as a single class, leading to severe performance degradation. Introducing geometric point features (GPE) significantly improves segmentation accuracy, reducing whole-object losses and enhancing the reliability of perception in both synthetic and real-world scenarios.
Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗
Loading article text…
What the source reports
Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.
Reported numbers
test points
4.5–5.4
View original evidence
column absorbs up to 70% of all test points; with randomized layouts the sink moves to the stair, predicted at 4.5-5.4x its true share across three training seeds. Baseline mIoU falls to 0.15-0.27 (fixed) and 0.36-0.72 (randomized), and up to 269 whole objects vanish in a single test set. Appending 14 hand-computed geometric features per point (GPE) restores mIoU to 0.54-0.92 and removes 64-100% of whole-object loss
Open source S3mIoU
0.15–0.27
View original evidence
column absorbs up to 70% of all test points; with randomized layouts the sink moves to the stair, predicted at 4.5-5.4x its true share across three training seeds. Baseline mIoU falls to 0.15-0.27 (fixed) and 0.36-0.72 (randomized), and up to 269 whole objects vanish in a single test set. Appending 14 hand-computed geometric features per point (GPE) restores mIoU to 0.54-0.92 and removes 64-100% of whole-object loss
Open source S3mIoU
0.36–0.72
View original evidence
column absorbs up to 70% of all test points; with randomized layouts the sink moves to the stair, predicted at 4.5-5.4x its true share across three training seeds. Baseline mIoU falls to 0.15-0.27 (fixed) and 0.36-0.72 (randomized), and up to 269 whole objects vanish in a single test set. Appending 14 hand-computed geometric features per point (GPE) restores mIoU to 0.54-0.92 and removes 64-100% of whole-object loss
Open source S3whole objects
≤269
View original evidence
column absorbs up to 70% of all test points; with randomized layouts the sink moves to the stair, predicted at 4.5-5.4x its true share across three training seeds. Baseline mIoU falls to 0.15-0.27 (fixed) and 0.36-0.72 (randomized), and up to 269 whole objects vanish in a single test set. Appending 14 hand-computed geometric features per point (GPE) restores mIoU to 0.54-0.92 and removes 64-100% of whole-object loss
Open source S3
- paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record
Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.
arXiv:2610.34040v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Construction robots must label building elements they can only partly see. We show that when occlusion at test time removes whole regions of a scene, rather than parts of an object as in training, point-cloud segmentation networks do not simply miss the hidden elements: they relabel them, and the errors collapse onto a single sink class. With fixed synthetic layouts the
Open source S2
column absorbs up to 70% of all test points; with randomized layouts the sink moves to the stair, predicted at 4.5-5.4x its true share across three training seeds. Baseline mIoU falls to 0.15-0.27 (fixed) and 0.36-0.72 (randomized), and up to 269 whole objects vanish in a single test set. Appending 14 hand-computed geometric features per point (GPE) restores mIoU to 0.54-0.92 and removes 64-100% of whole-object loss
Open source S3
Source：arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org