Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Jiarui Yuan, Yuxin Zuo, Xiaoyu Huang, Wenbo Zhang, Kwanyoung Park, Junlin Yang, Tianxiang Zhang, Ruoqu Chen, Yutao Ouyang, Bingxiang He, Xingtai Lv, Hongjin Wu, Jiajun Liu, Jiahao Zhao, Tianwei Luo, Haozhan Li, Cheng Qian, Jiaxin Ge, Huan-ang Gao, Kaisen Yang, Jiaqi Deng, Qixin Xu, Siqiao Huang, Bowen Zhou, Mengdi Xu, Zhiyuan Liu, Pieter Abbeel, Ning Ding·· 1 days agoSignalEditorial score75

Democratizing Robot-Use Agents: A Unified Harness with Open Models

Democratizing Robot-Use Agents: A Unified Harness with Open Models

Summary

This paper introduces uni-robot-agent, an open-weight harness for robot-use agents that supports further training without relying on proprietary models. Using Qwen3.8-Flash-Next out-of-the-box, the system achieves a RoboDojo Score of 31.39, surpassing the published GPT-6 Astra-RoboProbe result of 28.97 and performing competitively on 19 real-world tasks. The authors analyze model generations, families, and sizes to link effective robot use to four general capabilities, suggesting future training should develop them jointly.

Editorial context

The authors introduce uni-robot-agent, an open-weight harness designed to enable further training of robot-use agents without relying on proprietary models; the reported RoboDojo Score of 31.39 is achieved by Qwen3.8-Flash-Next under out-of-the-box conditions and is compared against a published GPT-6 Astra-RoboProbe result of 28.97.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • RoboDojo Score

    31.39

    View original evidence
    ash-Next achieves a RoboDojo Score of 31.39, surpassing the published GPT-6 Astra-RoboProbe result of 28.97 and many VLA/WAM baselines, and performs competitively on 19 real-world tasks. Our analysis across model generations, families, and sizes links effective robot use to four general capabilities, suggesting that future RUA training should develop them jointly.
    Open source S3
  • GPT-6 Astra-RoboProbe RoboDojo Score

    28.97

    View original evidence
    ash-Next achieves a RoboDojo Score of 31.39, surpassing the published GPT-6 Astra-RoboProbe result of 28.97 and many VLA/WAM baselines, and performs competitively on 19 real-world tasks. Our analysis across model generations, families, and sizes links effective robot use to four general capabilities, suggesting that future RUA training should develop them jointly.
    Open source S3
  • RoboDojo Score (GPT-6 Astra-RoboProbe)

    28.97

    View original evidence
    ash-Next achieves a RoboDojo Score of 31.39, surpassing the published GPT-6 Astra-RoboProbe result of 28.97 and many VLA/WAM baselines, and performs competitively on 19 real-world tasks. Our analysis across model generations, families, and sizes links effective robot use to four general capabilities, suggesting that future RUA training should develop them jointly.
    Open source S3
  • RoboDojo Score (uni-robot-agent)

    31.39

    View original evidence
    ash-Next achieves a RoboDojo Score of 31.39, surpassing the published GPT-6 Astra-RoboProbe result of 28.97 and many VLA/WAM baselines, and performs competitively on 19 real-world tasks. Our analysis across model generations, families, and sizes links effective robot use to four general capabilities, suggesting that future RUA training should develop them jointly.
    Open source S3
  • paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

ash-Next achieves a RoboDojo Score of 31.39, surpassing the published GPT-6 Astra-RoboProbe result of 28.97 and many VLA/WAM baselines, and performs competitively on 19 real-world tasks. Our analysis across model generations, families, and sizes links effective robot use to four general capabilities, suggesting that future RUA training should develop them jointly.

Open source S3

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).