Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Mohammed Al-Ghaili, Yakoop Qasim, Hassan Almubarak·· 1 days agoSignalEditorial score75

Differentiable Iterative Learning Control for Black-Box Position-Commanded Manipulators

Differentiable Iterative Learning Control for Black-Box Position-Commanded Manipulators

Summary

This research introduces Differentiable Iterative Learning Control (Diff-ILC), an online bilevel framework that adapts constrained iterative learning control parameters between physical robot executions without requiring access to low-level controllers. By identifying a closed-loop differential model from paired smooth perturbations and using hypergradients derived from implicitly differentiating the locally active KKT system, Diff-ILC enables multiple computational parameter updates without additional robot executions. Experiments on a 6-DoF DOBOT CR3 show that after only two trial-to-trial updates, Diff-ILC achieves 78.8% and 76.4% lower mean joint-vector and Cartesian RMSE, respectively, compared to fixed-parameter model-based ILC across four primary trajectories.

Editorial context

The study presents a differentiable iterative learning control framework for black-box manipulators, demonstrating improved convergence and reduced error metrics on a 6-DoF DOBOT CR3 across multiple trajectories.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Data origin
Robot trajectoriesOpen source S4

Reported numbers

  • trajectories

    4

    Reported trials

    View original evidence
    enabling multiple computational parameter updates without additional robot executions. Experiments on a 6-DoF DOBOT CR3 across unseen planar and three-dimensional trajectories show substantially faster physical-trial convergence than fixed-parameter model-based ILC. Across the four primary trajectories, after only two trial-to-trial updates, Diff-ILC achieves 78.8% and 76.4% lower mean joint-vector and Cartesian RMSE
    Open source S4
  • trial-to-trial updates

    2 trials

    View original evidence
    enabling multiple computational parameter updates without additional robot executions. Experiments on a 6-DoF DOBOT CR3 across unseen planar and three-dimensional trajectories show substantially faster physical-trial convergence than fixed-parameter model-based ILC. Across the four primary trajectories, after only two trial-to-trial updates, Diff-ILC achieves 78.8% and 76.4% lower mean joint-vector and Cartesian RMSE
    Open source S4
  • DoF

    6

    View original evidence
    enabling multiple computational parameter updates without additional robot executions. Experiments on a 6-DoF DOBOT CR3 across unseen planar and three-dimensional trajectories show substantially faster physical-trial convergence than fixed-parameter model-based ILC. Across the four primary trajectories, after only two trial-to-trial updates, Diff-ILC achieves 78.8% and 76.4% lower mean joint-vector and Cartesian RMSE
    Open source S4
  • paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

enabling multiple computational parameter updates without additional robot executions. Experiments on a 6-DoF DOBOT CR3 across unseen planar and three-dimensional trajectories show substantially faster physical-trial convergence than fixed-parameter model-based ILC. Across the four primary trajectories, after only two trial-to-trial updates, Diff-ILC achieves 78.8% and 76.4% lower mean joint-vector and Cartesian RMSE

Open source S4

arXiv:2611.01220v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-accuracy repetitive tracking is challenging for position-commanded manipulators whose low-level controllers are inaccessible, while constrained model-based iterative learning control (ILC) can require substantial manual parameter tuning. We present Differentiable Iterative Learning Control (Diff-ILC), an online bilevel framework that adapts the parameters of a cons

Open source S2

Implications for data suppliers

RoboSignal interpretation and collection questions, not statements of buyer demand.

  • Match the buyer’s robot embodiment, action space, sensors and timestamp requirements before planning collection.
  • Compare the reported units and scope before using these quantities in a budget. Recording hours, sensor-hours and trajectories are different measures.
  • Validate demand and acceptance criteria with a buyer before scaling. Publication, popularity and a research result do not establish a purchase commitment.

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).