Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Ziming Liu, Yizhan Qu, Leichen Wang, Hao Sun·· 1 days agoSignalEditorial score75

DriftingPlanner: Drifting Generative Models for One-Step Trajectory Planning in End-to-End Autonomous Driving

DriftingPlanner: Drifting Generative Models for One-Step Trajectory Planning in End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Summary

This research presents DriftingPlanner, a trajectory planner that employs drifting generative models to achieve one-step inference in end-to-end autonomous driving. The method trains a generator to follow an attraction-repulsion field between generated and ground-truth samples per scene, avoiding the blending of plausible maneuvers into invalid trajectories common in coordinate regression. On NAVSIM navtest, DriftingPlanner achieves a state-of-the-art 93.75 PDMS score. With single-step inference, its drifting decoder is within 0.13 PDMS of the best diffusion or flow matching settings that require ten inference steps.

Editorial context

The paper introduces DriftingPlanner, a one-step trajectory planner for autonomous driving that uses a generative model trained with a drifting loss to avoid blending plausible maneuvers into invalid trajectories, achieving 93.75 PDMS on NAVSIM navtest and staying within 0.13 PDMS of multi-step diffusion or flow matching baselines.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • PDMS score

    93.75

    Reported trials

    View original evidence
    ched pass, and averaging each antithetic pair cancels the linear part of the displacement from the shell center. On NAVSIM navtest, DriftingPlanner reaches a state-of-the-art 93.75 PDMS, and with single-step inference its drifting decoder comes within 0.13 PDMS of the best diffusion or flow matching setting, which needs ten inference steps.
    Open source S5
  • PDMS difference

    0.13

    View original evidence
    ched pass, and averaging each antithetic pair cancels the linear part of the displacement from the shell center. On NAVSIM navtest, DriftingPlanner reaches a state-of-the-art 93.75 PDMS, and with single-step inference its drifting decoder comes within 0.13 PDMS of the best diffusion or flow matching setting, which needs ten inference steps.
    Open source S5
  • Robot trajectories

    1 trajectories

    Trajectory count

    View original evidence
    arXiv:2611.01283v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: End-to-end planners decode the ego trajectory either by coordinate regression, which is fast but blends plausible maneuvers into one trajectory that may follow none of them, or by diffusion and flow matching, which model the trajectory distribution but need several inference steps. Drifting models move this iteration into training: a one-step generator learns to follo
    Open source S2
  • paper: not_reported
  • code: not_reported
  • weights: not_reported
  • dataset: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

ched pass, and averaging each antithetic pair cancels the linear part of the displacement from the shell center. On NAVSIM navtest, DriftingPlanner reaches a state-of-the-art 93.75 PDMS, and with single-step inference its drifting decoder comes within 0.13 PDMS of the best diffusion or flow matching setting, which needs ten inference steps.

Open source S5

arXiv:2611.01283v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: End-to-end planners decode the ego trajectory either by coordinate regression, which is fast but blends plausible maneuvers into one trajectory that may follow none of them, or by diffusion and flow matching, which model the trajectory distribution but need several inference steps. Drifting models move this iteration into training: a one-step generator learns to follo

Open source S2

DriftingPlanner: Drifting Generative Models for One-Step Trajectory Planning in End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Open source S1

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).