Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Kangrui Wang, Qineng Wang, Changhe Chen, Pingyue Zhang, Chi Gui, Feishi Wang, Canyu Chen, Wenli Xiao, Xiaoyu Huang, Tonghe Zhang, Linjie Li, Zihan Wang, Minyeong Kim, Yiyou Sun, Mingkai Deng, Jinyu Hou, Qi Zhu, Han Liu, Eric P. Xing, Huaxiu Yao, Zhiwen Fan, Yuejiang Liu, Dawn Song, Pieter Abbeel, Li Fei-Fei, Jiajun Wu, Yuke Zhu, Guanya Shi, Ruohan Zhang, Manling Li·· 2 days agoSignalEditorial score75

Embodied First Exam

Embodied First Exam

Summary

The authors introduce the Embodied First Exam, a comprehensive evaluation framework designed to assess coding agents' ability to control diverse robots under physical-world constraints. The framework supports three control approaches: direct control, code-to-control, and policy training. It includes 1,156 tasks across 35 suites on 47 robots, covering spatial puzzles, dexterous manipulation, multi-robot interaction, dynamic whole-body control, and sim-to-sim engineering. Tasks can be evaluated in Standard Setting (sensor-only, no environment reset) or Privileged Setting (full simulator state access). On 456 core tasks, GPT-6 Astra in Codex achieves a 34% success rate in the Standard Setting.

Editorial context

The paper introduces the Embodied First Exam, a unified evaluation framework for coding agents that supports three control modes (direct, code-based, and policy training) across 47 robots and 1,156 tasks in 35 suites, with results reported for Standard and Privileged settings to distinguish real-world constraints from oracle upper bounds.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • tasks

    1,156

    View original evidence
    , and agent-native evaluation framework where coding agents can choose their own control approach: direct control, code to control, or train a policy to control. We hope it serves as a first exam for coding agents before they enter the physical world, with 1,156 tasks in 35 suites on 47 robots, including 9 new suites that go beyond pick-and-place to spatial puzzles, dexterous manipulation, multi-robot interaction, dy
    Open source S3
  • suites

    35

    View original evidence
    , and agent-native evaluation framework where coding agents can choose their own control approach: direct control, code to control, or train a policy to control. We hope it serves as a first exam for coding agents before they enter the physical world, with 1,156 tasks in 35 suites on 47 robots, including 9 new suites that go beyond pick-and-place to spatial puzzles, dexterous manipulation, multi-robot interaction, dy
    Open source S3
  • Robot count

    47 robots

    View original evidence
    , and agent-native evaluation framework where coding agents can choose their own control approach: direct control, code to control, or train a policy to control. We hope it serves as a first exam for coding agents before they enter the physical world, with 1,156 tasks in 35 suites on 47 robots, including 9 new suites that go beyond pick-and-place to spatial puzzles, dexterous manipulation, multi-robot interaction, dy
    Open source S3
  • core tasks

    456

    View original evidence
    lowing it to search for an oracle solution for training purposes. Success rates in this setting serve as an approximate upper bound. On the 456 core tasks, the strongest of eight agents, GPT-6 Astra in Codex, achieves a success rate of 34% in the Standard Setting, leaving much room for improvement. To see where agents fail, we label the stage at which failed attempts go wrong and compare failures across agents, setti
    Open source S5
  • Reported success rate

    34%

    View original evidence
    lowing it to search for an oracle solution for training purposes. Success rates in this setting serve as an approximate upper bound. On the 456 core tasks, the strongest of eight agents, GPT-6 Astra in Codex, achieves a success rate of 34% in the Standard Setting, leaving much room for improvement. To see where agents fail, we label the stage at which failed attempts go wrong and compare failures across agents, setti
    Open source S5
  • paper: not_reported

What remains unknown

Not established in the collected evidence: Environment, Control, Data origin.

Dataset licensing and commercial-use rights are not established here.

Reported performance applies to the described task. It does not establish general autonomy or deployment readiness.

Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

, and agent-native evaluation framework where coding agents can choose their own control approach: direct control, code to control, or train a policy to control. We hope it serves as a first exam for coding agents before they enter the physical world, with 1,156 tasks in 35 suites on 47 robots, including 9 new suites that go beyond pick-and-place to spatial puzzles, dexterous manipulation, multi-robot interaction, dy

Open source S3

lowing it to search for an oracle solution for training purposes. Success rates in this setting serve as an approximate upper bound. On the 456 core tasks, the strongest of eight agents, GPT-6 Astra in Codex, achieves a success rate of 34% in the Standard Setting, leaving much room for improvement. To see where agents fail, we label the stage at which failed attempts go wrong and compare failures across agents, setti

Open source S5

Implications for data suppliers

RoboSignal interpretation and collection questions, not statements of buyer demand.

  • Confirm the required data type and collection setting with the buyer; this source does not establish a complete collection specification.
  • Compare the reported units and scope before using these quantities in a budget. Recording hours, sensor-hours and trajectories are different measures.
  • Validate demand and acceptance criteria with a buyer before scaling. Publication, popularity and a research result do not establish a purchase commitment.

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).