Skip to content
Machine Heart — Robotics on WeChat·· 5 days agoSignalEditorial score88

Embodied RSI Paradigm Breaks Through Zero-Shot Generalization Bottleneck for Robots: Recursia Outperforms NVIDIA ASPIRE by 10 Points in Long-Term Tasks

Embodied RSI范式突破机器人零样本泛化瓶颈:Recursia长时任务超英伟达ASPIRE 10个点

Summary

This article introduces the Recursia framework, which achieves embodied recursive self-improvement (RSI) by organizing the system as an internal and external dual-loop structure, enabling generalization in robot zero-shot long-sequence tasks. Recursia achieved success rates of 28.4% and 53.4% in LIBERO-Pro Long tasks, respectively 5.8 and 15.1 percentage points higher than NVIDIA ASPIRE. The study emphasizes the importance of integrating execution feedback into high-level decision-making and explores the challenges of maintaining task success across different execution contexts.

Source: Machine Heart — Robotics on WeChat · Read original article ↗

English translation unavailable. Choose the original article to read it.

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • Reported success rate

    43.4%

    View original evidence
    另一组迭代分析中,Task 方向的成功率从第 0 轮的 0% 提高到第 18 轮的 43.4%,中间存在波动。
    Open source S9
  • Reported success rate

    66.7%

    View original evidence
    按表 1 的真机结果,Recursia 的三任务平均成功率比 SD-only 高出 40 个百分点(66.7% vs 26.7%) ;其中 “先把碗放上盘子、再把杯子放进移动后的碗” 这一强组合依赖任务,基线为 20%,Recursia 为 100%。
    Open source S10
  • paper: not_reported
  • code: not_reported
  • weights: not_reported
  • dataset: not_reported

What remains unknown

Not established in the collected evidence: Environment, Control, Data origin.

Reported performance applies to the described task. It does not establish general autonomy or deployment readiness.

Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

实验发现,Recursia 在目标任务上不进行代码调试的零样本迁移设置下,在 LIBERO-Pro Long 上取得 28%(位置扰动)/ 53%(任务扰动)的成功率,比英伟达 ASPIRE 分别 高出 5.8 和 15.1 个百分点 ,而 OpenVLA、π₀ 等 VLA 模型几乎全军覆没(0%),π₀.₅ 在两类扰动下分别为 8% 和 1%。

Open source S8

另一组迭代分析中,Task 方向的成功率从第 0 轮的 0% 提高到第 18 轮的 43.4%,中间存在波动。

Open source S9

按表 1 的真机结果,Recursia 的三任务平均成功率比 SD-only 高出 40 个百分点(66.7% vs 26.7%) ;其中 “先把碗放上盘子、再把杯子放进移动后的碗” 这一强组合依赖任务,基线为 20%,Recursia 为 100%。

Open source S10

Source:Machine Heart — Robotics on WeChat · mp.weixin.qq.com

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).