Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Devin Han, Hershraj Niranjani·· 3 hours agoSignalEditorial score76

Embodiment-Classifier Guidance: Transferring Frozen VLAs Across Robot Dynamics without Demonstrations

Embodiment-Classifier Guidance: Transferring Frozen VLAs Across Robot Dynamics without Demonstrations

Summary

This research proposes a method to adapt frozen vision-language agents (VLAs) to new robot embodiments without additional demonstrations. By training a lightweight embodiment classifier to distinguish successful action chunks on source and target bodies, the method nudges the denoising steps of the original policy with the classifier's gradient, improving success rates on transfer tasks. The approach shows promise in simulation but has limitations when data is insufficient or motions are infeasible.

Editorial context

This paper introduces a method to transfer frozen vision-language agents (VLAs) to new robot embodiments without additional demonstrations, using a lightweight embodiment classifier to guide the transfer process. The approach shows promise in simulation, improving success rates on transfer tasks, though it has limitations when the classifier lacks sufficient data or favors infeasible motions.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Environment
SimulationOpen source S4

Reported numbers

  • number of tasks

    12

    View original evidence
    aises $\pi_0$'s average success on the target bodies from 72% to 80% across 12 suite-controller pairs, with a 31% relative reduction in failures (11 of 12 gain; 5 significant after Holm correction). In simulation, guidance is data-efficient, needing few target-body rollouts per task, which makes it promising for sim-to-real transfer, where rollouts are costly. Guidance is mixed on weak wrists and harmful on a locked
    Open source S4
  • number of successes

    11

    View original evidence
    aises $\pi_0$'s average success on the target bodies from 72% to 80% across 12 suite-controller pairs, with a 31% relative reduction in failures (11 of 12 gain; 5 significant after Holm correction). In simulation, guidance is data-efficient, needing few target-body rollouts per task, which makes it promising for sim-to-real transfer, where rollouts are costly. Guidance is mixed on weak wrists and harmful on a locked
    Open source S4
  • number of significant results

    5

    View original evidence
    aises $\pi_0$'s average success on the target bodies from 72% to 80% across 12 suite-controller pairs, with a 31% relative reduction in failures (11 of 12 gain; 5 significant after Holm correction). In simulation, guidance is data-efficient, needing few target-body rollouts per task, which makes it promising for sim-to-real transfer, where rollouts are costly. Guidance is mixed on weak wrists and harmful on a locked
    Open source S4
  • paper: not_reported
  • code: not_reported
  • weights: not_reported
  • dataset: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

aises $\pi_0$'s average success on the target bodies from 72% to 80% across 12 suite-controller pairs, with a 31% relative reduction in failures (11 of 12 gain; 5 significant after Holm correction). In simulation, guidance is data-efficient, needing few target-body rollouts per task, which makes it promising for sim-to-real transfer, where rollouts are costly. Guidance is mixed on weak wrists and harmful on a locked

Open source S4

wrist, when the classifier lacks data or favors infeasible motions. Collecting more target-body data with guided $\pi_0$ can fill such gaps: on one weak-wrist arm, guided $\pi_0$ solved a task on which unguided $\pi_0$ had zero successes in the original data, and retraining the classifier on the guided successes raised success from 52.5% to 70.7%.

Open source S5

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).