Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Seyed Ali Mirghasemi, Alireza Taheri·· 4 days agoEditorial score58

F2A-ObjectNav: An Adaptive Agentic Architecture for Object-Goal Navigation

F2A-ObjectNav: An Adaptive Agentic Architecture for Object-Goal Navigation

Summary

This research presents F2, an adaptive agentic architecture for object-goal navigation, which uses a rule-based Supervisor to coordinate specialized components for exploration, object detection, and target validation. The system is evaluated in AI2-THOR, RoboTHOR, and ProcTHOR, achieving success rates of 0.84, 0.40, and 0.44, respectively, with additional behavioral metrics analyzing adaptive interventions.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • success rate

    0.84

    View original evidence
    , and ProcTHOR, achieving success rate (SR) / success-weighted path length (SPL) values of 0.84/0.52, 0.40/0.22, and 0.44/0.37, respectively. In addition to task-level metrics, architecture-specific behavioral metrics are used to characterize semantic-guidance usage, strategy switching, recovery activation, memory-supported behavior, and decision stability. The results show different patterns of adaptive intervention
    Open source S5
  • success-weighted path length

    0.52

    View original evidence
    , and ProcTHOR, achieving success rate (SR) / success-weighted path length (SPL) values of 0.84/0.52, 0.40/0.22, and 0.44/0.37, respectively. In addition to task-level metrics, architecture-specific behavioral metrics are used to characterize semantic-guidance usage, strategy switching, recovery activation, memory-supported behavior, and decision stability. The results show different patterns of adaptive intervention
    Open source S5
  • success rate

    0.4

    View original evidence
    , and ProcTHOR, achieving success rate (SR) / success-weighted path length (SPL) values of 0.84/0.52, 0.40/0.22, and 0.44/0.37, respectively. In addition to task-level metrics, architecture-specific behavioral metrics are used to characterize semantic-guidance usage, strategy switching, recovery activation, memory-supported behavior, and decision stability. The results show different patterns of adaptive intervention
    Open source S5
  • success-weighted path length

    0.22

    View original evidence
    , and ProcTHOR, achieving success rate (SR) / success-weighted path length (SPL) values of 0.84/0.52, 0.40/0.22, and 0.44/0.37, respectively. In addition to task-level metrics, architecture-specific behavioral metrics are used to characterize semantic-guidance usage, strategy switching, recovery activation, memory-supported behavior, and decision stability. The results show different patterns of adaptive intervention
    Open source S5
  • success rate

    0.44

    View original evidence
    , and ProcTHOR, achieving success rate (SR) / success-weighted path length (SPL) values of 0.84/0.52, 0.40/0.22, and 0.44/0.37, respectively. In addition to task-level metrics, architecture-specific behavioral metrics are used to characterize semantic-guidance usage, strategy switching, recovery activation, memory-supported behavior, and decision stability. The results show different patterns of adaptive intervention
    Open source S5
  • success-weighted path length

    0.37

    View original evidence
    , and ProcTHOR, achieving success rate (SR) / success-weighted path length (SPL) values of 0.84/0.52, 0.40/0.22, and 0.44/0.37, respectively. In addition to task-level metrics, architecture-specific behavioral metrics are used to characterize semantic-guidance usage, strategy switching, recovery activation, memory-supported behavior, and decision stability. The results show different patterns of adaptive intervention
    Open source S5
  • paper: not_reported
  • code: not_reported
  • weights: not_reported
  • dataset: not_reported

What remains unknown

Not established in the collected evidence: Environment, Control, Data origin.

Reported performance applies to the described task. It does not establish general autonomy or deployment readiness.

Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

, and ProcTHOR, achieving success rate (SR) / success-weighted path length (SPL) values of 0.84/0.52, 0.40/0.22, and 0.44/0.37, respectively. In addition to task-level metrics, architecture-specific behavioral metrics are used to characterize semantic-guidance usage, strategy switching, recovery activation, memory-supported behavior, and decision stability. The results show different patterns of adaptive intervention

Open source S5

across the three environments, with higher intervention frequencies observed in RoboTHOR and ProcTHOR than in AI2-THOR.

Open source S6

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).