Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Shaokai Wu, Xunchu Zhou, Pinzhi Wang, Bo Dong, Yuting Hu, Yanbiao Ji, Qiuchang Li, Xiao Cui, Qi Kong, Hongtao Lu, Yue Ding·· 2 days agoSignalEditorial score75

ForeseeDrive: Future-Token Conditioning for Anticipatory Generative Driving

ForeseeDrive: Future-Token Conditioning for Anticipatory Generative Driving

Summary

This research paper presents ForeseeDrive, a method that converts future scene evolution into an interface for shaping generative driving candidates. By deriving query-indexed tokens from logged motion and occupancy data to condition trajectory geometry before candidate generation, the approach aims to recover maneuvers absent in standard sampling menus. The system includes mechanisms like zero-token-gated residual paths and TTC-margin guards to limit drift and ensure safety. Benchmark results show an 89.2 PDMS score on NAVSIM navtest, 0.41 m average L2 error, and a 0.05% collision rate on nuScenes validation, alongside a 76.50 driving score on Bench2Drive. Diagnostics reveal mixed oracle-best quality and localized failures near safe-to-unsafe boundaries, supporting the utility of future-conditioned generation as a practical anticipation interface.

Editorial context

The paper introduces a generative driving planning method that uses future-token conditioning to shape trajectory candidates before they are generated, achieving specific benchmark scores on NAVSIM and nuScenes while identifying localized failures at TTC-boundary crossings.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • average L2 error

    0.41

    View original evidence
    s. Under their respective benchmark protocols, ForeseeDrive reaches 89.2 PDMS on NAVSIM navtest, 0.41\,m average L2 and 0.05\% collision rate on nuScenes validation, and a 76.50 driving score on Bench2Drive. Controlled DiffusionDrive/NAVSIM diagnostics show an exact zero-token no-op, a small aligned-over-shuffled selected-PDM advantage under preservation, mixed oracle-best quality, and localized TTC-boundary failures
    Open source S4
  • driving score

    76.5

    Reported trials

    View original evidence
    s. Under their respective benchmark protocols, ForeseeDrive reaches 89.2 PDMS on NAVSIM navtest, 0.41\,m average L2 and 0.05\% collision rate on nuScenes validation, and a 76.50 driving score on Bench2Drive. Controlled DiffusionDrive/NAVSIM diagnostics show an exact zero-token no-op, a small aligned-over-shuffled selected-PDM advantage under preservation, mixed oracle-best quality, and localized TTC-boundary failures
    Open source S4
  • PDMS score

    89.2

    Reported trials

    View original evidence
    s. Under their respective benchmark protocols, ForeseeDrive reaches 89.2 PDMS on NAVSIM navtest, 0.41\,m average L2 and 0.05\% collision rate on nuScenes validation, and a 76.50 driving score on Bench2Drive. Controlled DiffusionDrive/NAVSIM diagnostics show an exact zero-token no-op, a small aligned-over-shuffled selected-PDM advantage under preservation, mixed oracle-best quality, and localized TTC-boundary failures
    Open source S4
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

s. Under their respective benchmark protocols, ForeseeDrive reaches 89.2 PDMS on NAVSIM navtest, 0.41\,m average L2 and 0.05\% collision rate on nuScenes validation, and a 76.50 driving score on Bench2Drive. Controlled DiffusionDrive/NAVSIM diagnostics show an exact zero-token no-op, a small aligned-over-shuffled selected-PDM advantage under preservation, mixed oracle-best quality, and localized TTC-boundary failures

Open source S4

ForeseeDrive: Future-Token Conditioning for Anticipatory Generative Driving

Open source S1

arXiv:2611.14286v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative driving planners can represent diverse ego futures, but a downstream scorer can choose only among sampled candidates; it cannot recover an absent maneuver. We present ForeseeDrive, which turns future scene evolution into a deployable interface for shaping candidate generation. Rather than reconstructing dense future states or scoring a fixed menu, ForeseeDriv

Open source S2

e derives query-indexed tokens from logged actor motion, occupancy evolution, route interactions, and TTC margins, and predicts the same token space from present context at deployment. The tokens condition trajectory geometry before candidates materialize. A zero-token-gated residual path and candidate-preservation loss limit unnecessary drift, while a TTC-margin guard targets brittle safe-to-unsafe boundary crossing

Open source S3

. Together, the benchmark results and bounded mechanism tests support future-conditioned generation as a practical interface for anticipation. Code is included in the supplementary materials.

Open source S5

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).