Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Aashish Sahu, R. Prasanth Kumar·· 14 hours agoEditorial score42

Geometry-Aware Predictive Control for Bipedal Obstacle Crossing

Geometry-Aware Predictive Control for Walk-to-Run Bipedal Obstacle Crossing

Summary

A framework enables smooth walk-to-run transitions for bipedal robots crossing obstacles. It uses five phases and MPC to ensure clearance and stability, achieving success on four out of five obstacles.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Environment
SimulationOpen source S4

Reported numbers

  • body-obstacle clearances

    0.036

    View original evidence
    minimum body-obstacle clearances of 0.036, 0.036, 0.059, and 0.017 m
    Open source S5
  • body-obstacle clearances

    0.059

    View original evidence
    minimum body-obstacle clearances of 0.036, 0.036, 0.059, and 0.017 m
    Open source S5
  • body-obstacle clearances

    0.017

    View original evidence
    minimum body-obstacle clearances of 0.036, 0.036, 0.059, and 0.017 m
    Open source S5
  • obstacles

    >5

    View original evidence
    over five progressively difficult obstacles
    Open source S4
  • clearances

    0.036

    View original evidence
    minimum body-obstacle clearances of 0.036, 0.036, 0.059, and 0.017 m
    Open source S5
  • clearances

    0.059

    View original evidence
    minimum body-obstacle clearances of 0.036, 0.036, 0.059, and 0.017 m
    Open source S5
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

es smooth walk-to-run transition without discrete controller switching. The generated references are tracked using MPC to regulate motion smoothness, clearance feasibility, touchdown behavior, and lateral admissibility. The framework is evaluated in reduced-order simulation over five progressively difficult obstacles under walking and running conditions. The robot successfully crosses the first four obstacles, achiev

Open source S4

ing minimum body-obstacle clearances of 0.036, 0.036, 0.059, and 0.017 m, respectively. The fifth and most demanding obstacle leads to collision, identifying the current operating boundary of the proposed reduced-order formulation. Overall, the method provides a compact, interpretable, and computationally efficient basis for intelligent obstacle-aware bipedal locomotion.

Open source S5

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).