Skip to content
IT Home — Robotics·· 2 days agoSignalEditorial score75

Google Unveils Gemini Robotics 2.5, a VLA Model with Enhanced Dexterity and Reliability

谷歌最强 VLA 机器人模型:Gemini Robotics 2.5 登场,会系蝴蝶结、已在奔驰生产线上岗

Summary

Google has launched Gemini Robotics 2.5, its most capable visual-language-action (VLA) robot model to date, which significantly expands the breadth of learnable skills and learning speed for robots. The model improves dexterity, reliability, and safety, enabling robots to operate in unstructured real-world environments. Tested across over 200 tasks, it achieves up to 100% higher success rates on certain tasks compared to previous baselines. In a concept validation with Apptronik's Apollo 2 humanoid robot at Mercedes-Benz production lines, the model achieved a 96% success rate in picking and packing automotive parts.

Source: IT Home — Robotics · Read original article ↗

Article text · Machine translation into English

IT Home On November 10, Google released the most capable Vision-Language-Action (VLA) robot model to date Gemini Robotics 2.5, significantly improving the breadth of skills and learning speed that robots can acquire.

The model enhances the dexterity, reliability, and safety of robots, helping robots leave the laboratory, enter more unstructured real-world environments, and assist humans in completing more types of tasks.

谷歌Gemini Robotics 2.5模型效果图

Earlier this year, Google already introduced it for various types of robots, including humanoid robots Full-body intelligence.This progress was largely benefited by Gemini 4 Argon's ability to accelerate robot R&D, further expanding the boundaries of physical intelligence.

Google in over 200 items The task breadth, performance, and complexity of Gemini Robotics 2.5 were tested across different tasks.

Gemini Robotics 2.5 achieved leaps in three key areas:

  • Dexterity: Robots can use everyday tools, handle delicate flexible objects, complete significantly more tasks, and performance and dexterity are greatly improved.

  • reliability: In a real-world concept validation on a Mercedes production line, this model assisted Apptronik's Apollo 2 humanoid robot in picking and packing car parts, with a success rate of 96%, capable of handling monotonous work, allowing technicians to focus on complex assembly tasks.

  • Safety: As robots enter everyday environments, Google optimized physical safety steerability and launched a brand-new testing benchmark for robot adversarial jailbreaking.

Currently, Gemini Robotics 2.5 is open to Google's robotics partners.

Real-world environments are unstructured and unpredictable, and robots must possess both high precision and high reliability to handle everyday objects. With Gemini Robotics 2.5, Google has expanded the model's capabilities in task breadth, performance, and complexity, with test tasks reaching 200 items, For example, distributing food with tongs, tying bows on gift boxes, and pipetting liquids, etc.

These tasks integrate multiple skills such as advanced tool use, complex deformable object manipulation, and delicate handling of fragile items, representing a step toward human-level dexterity.

Evaluations show that the model has significant improvements in task accuracy, robustness, and speed: compared to the previous baseline, Gemini Robotics 2.5, depending on the task type, has a success rate higher by 30% to 100%, and task completion speed faster by 20% to 30%.

Consistent with the previous generation Gemini Robotics model, it natively adapts to multiple robot types, including the Apptronik Apollo 2 humanoid robot equipped with a five-fingered 22-degree-of-freedom SharpaWave hand, as well as the Franka Duo platform equipped with a two-fingered parallel gripper.

The ultimate test for a robot model is whether it can stably execute tasks in real work scenarios. Google, in collaboration with Apptronik and Mercedes-Benz, deployed Apollo 2 humanoid robots to test Gemini Robotics 2.5 on active automobile production lines in Kecskemét, Hungary, and Sindelfingen, Germany.

The robot utilizes the embodied reasoning model (Gemini Robotics ER) developed by Google to track work workflows, and employs the Gemini Robotics 2.5 action model to control its arms and hands to take metal car brackets out of material bins and place them into sorting containers, while automatically correcting any gaps. This pilot project achieved a 96% success rate, demonstrating good progress in the technology's broad practical industrial applications.

Robots find it difficult to adapt to entirely new unpredictable environments, while the Gemini Robotics model gives Apollo the ability to think, perform multi-step reasoning, and adjust actions according to changes.

In this proof of concept, Apollo 2 autonomously completed the automotive parts picking task: this is a highly repetitive, physically demanding task that requires sorting individual components from bulk bins into organized pallets according to the precise requirements of each vehicle on the line. IT Home attaches the relevant video below:

The controllability of GR-2.5 achieved safe and human-aware robot movements

Entrusting such monotonous preparation work to robots can both ensure smooth assembly line operation and free up technical personnel to focus on complex assembly tasks.

Google uses the embodied reasoning model Gemini Robotics ER to track workflows, with the Gemini Robotics 2.5 action model controlling the robot's arms and hands: the robot reaches into the supply bin, picks up a metal car bracket, places it into a sorted container, and corrects assembly gaps throughout the process.

The pilot test success rate reached 96%, demonstrating considerable prospects for large-scale industrial scenario landing applications. When robots operate in cluttered daily spaces, physical safety is the primary consideration. Google significantly upgraded the safety features of Gemini Robotics 2.5.

A bar chart comparing the performance of Gemini Robotics 2.5 against Gemini Robotics 2 on various tabletop pick-and-place tasks, showing significant improvements in success rates.

Gemini Robotics 2.5 adopts an inference-time guidance mechanism, capable of avoiding physical hazards in real-time. Just as safety classifiers add a protective layer to Gemini's responses, this guidance capability allows robots to navigate safely through complex environments.

Upon evaluation, this capability improved the completion rate of safe tasks for robots around obstacles 33%, the completion rate of safety tasks around personnel is improved 43%.

Google is simultaneously advancing the safety capabilities of long-cycle agent tasks: Gemini 4 Argon is at a leading level in agent robot evaluations, with evaluation dimensions including refusal of dangerous tasks, uncertainty resolution, and close-range human-robot collaboration.

To test jailbreak robustness, Google released an open-source benchmark ASIMOV-Jailbreak, containing hundreds of prompts disguised as dangerous requests, covering dozens of categories of scenarios. Gemini 4 Argon's jailbreak resistance rate reaches 99.5%, a significant improvement over the 82% of the previous generation baseline Gemini Robotics ER 2.

To teach robots to master new skills, researchers need massive amounts of physical data and efficient construction algorithms. Gemini 4 Argon's robot R&D capabilities can serve as a simulation engine, solving the above bottlenecks and significantly accelerating the development progress of Gemini Robotics 2.5.

Gemini 4 Argon's robot research capabilities accelerated the development of Gemini Robotics 2.5

Argon can generate thousands of diverse simulated practice segments based on real camera scenes to build high-fidelity digital twins. Combined with real training demonstration data, robots can generalize and adapt to entirely new scenes and objects faster.

Argon can also help researchers deduce the reasons for task failures from video clips and synchronously test the optimal improvement plans in simulation environments and on real robots.

Accelerated by cutting-edge intelligent models like Gemini 4 Argon, Gemini Robotics 2.5 becomes an important milestone on the road toward physical general intelligence. Google continues to refine three dimensions—dexterity, real-world reliability, and rigorous safety—to create the physical intelligence required for robots and humans to collaborate in solving real-world challenges.

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Control
Reported autonomousOpen source S20

Reported numbers

  • Reported success rate

    96%

    Reported trials

    View original evidence
    可靠性 :在奔驰生产线的真实概念验证中,该模型助力 Apptronik 的 Apollo 2 人形机器人拣选并打包汽车零部件,成功率达 96% ,可承接单调工作,让技术人员专注于复杂装配任务。
    Open source S8
  • Reported success rate

    30%

    View original evidence
    评估显示,该模型在任务精度、鲁棒性与速度上均有显著提升:相较于此前基线,Gemini Robotics 2.5 按任务类型不同,成功率高出 30% 至 100% ,任务完成速度快 20% 至 30% 。
    Open source S13
  • Reported success rate

    100%

    View original evidence
    评估显示,该模型在任务精度、鲁棒性与速度上均有显著提升:相较于此前基线,Gemini Robotics 2.5 按任务类型不同,成功率高出 30% 至 100% ,任务完成速度快 20% 至 30% 。
    Open source S13
  • paper: not_reported

What remains unknown

Not established in the collected evidence: Environment, Data origin.

Reported performance applies to the described task. It does not establish general autonomy or deployment readiness.

Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

可靠性 :在奔驰生产线的真实概念验证中,该模型助力 Apptronik 的 Apollo 2 人形机器人拣选并打包汽车零部件,成功率达 96% ,可承接单调工作,让技术人员专注于复杂装配任务。

Open source S8

在此次概念验证中,Apollo 2 自主完成汽车物料拣配工作:这是一项重复性强、体力消耗大的任务,需要将散料箱中的单个零部件,按照线上每台车辆的精确需求顺序,分拣到规整托盘内。

Open source S20

与前代 Gemini Robotics 模型一致,它原生适配多种机器人类型,包括搭载五指 22 自由度 SharpaWave 手的 Apptronik Apollo 2 人形机器人,以及配备两指平行夹爪的 Franka Duo 平台。

Open source S14

谷歌与 Apptronik、奔驰合作,在匈牙利凯奇凯梅特、德国辛德尔芬根的在用汽车生产线上,部署 Apollo 2 人形机器人测试 Gemini Robotics 2.5。

Open source S16

该试点项目取得了 96% 的成功率,展现了该技术在广泛的实际工业应用方面取得的良好进展。

Open source S18

评估显示,该模型在任务精度、鲁棒性与速度上均有显著提升:相较于此前基线,Gemini Robotics 2.5 按任务类型不同,成功率高出 30% 至 100% ,任务完成速度快 20% 至 30% 。

Open source S13

Source:IT Home — Robotics · ithome.com

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).