Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Shitong Liu, Xu Yang, Jingwei Zhang, Sheng Lian, Xinyu Zhuang, Kaiwen Guo, Quan Liu, Chunhai Zhao, Jiaxin He, Fan Yang, Manli Tao, Tingyu Yuan, Hongwei Shi, Chaomin Guo, Xiao-jing Liu, Zhuang Xiong, Feichan Yang, Xiangyu Zhu, Jinqiao Wang, Chaoyang Zhao, Zhiyong Liu·· 9 days agoSignalEditorial score75

Labference: Benchmarking the Reasoning-Action Connection in Robotic Laboratories

Labference: Benchmarking the Reasoning-Action Connection in Robotic Laboratories

Summary

This research presents Labference, a new benchmark for evaluating embodied AI in robotic laboratories. It addresses the gap in existing evaluations by measuring how robots adapt their subsequent actions based on observed physical outcomes rather than just task completion. The study compares different control strategies, revealing that while some models succeed in object transfer, they may still suffer from target-selection errors, whereas others achieve correct selection but face execution failures and high computational costs. Labference aims to make the link between reasoning and action measurable to support autonomous experimentation.

Editorial context

The paper introduces Labference, a benchmark designed to evaluate the connection between physical outcomes and subsequent robotic choices in laboratory settings, distinguishing between reasoning errors and execution failures in current VLA and GPT-driven control policies.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

  • paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).