Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Manav Gagvani, Benjamin Namikas, Sivamurugan Velmurugan, Nysa Kumar, Shrey Sharma, Thomas Peterson, Pratyush Mathur, Hyunseo Chang, Rohan Paleja·· 3 hours agoSignalEditorial score75

Mechanistic Interpretability for End-to-End Self-Driving

Mechanistic Interpretability for End-to-End Self-Driving

Summary

This research applies mechanistic interpretability to end-to-end autonomous driving models by training Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) on internal activations. The study reveals interpretable structures aligned with route intent, vehicle speed, and braking behavior, recovering route intent with 98.3% accuracy without supervision. Through counterfactual image edits, specific SAE features are shown to be visually grounded in scene changes like traffic light states and stop sign presence. Steering individual SAE latents produces predictable changes in planner outputs. A lightweight adapter trained on SAE latents reduces trajectory selection error by 3.44%, outperforming an equivalent adapter that omits SAE latents. Code and visualizations are available at https://mgagvani.github.io/mechanistic-interpretability-for-e2e-driving/.

Editorial context

The study applies mechanistic interpretability techniques to an end-to-end autonomous driving model using Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to decode internal activations into interpretable features like route intent and braking behavior, achieving 98.3% accuracy in recovering route intent without supervision.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • Reported accuracy

    98.3%

    View original evidence
    retable structure aligned with route intent, vehicle speed, and braking behavior, recovering route intent with 98.3% accuracy without supervision. Through paired counterfactual image edits, we further show that specific SAE features are visually grounded and systematically respond to scene changes such as traffic light state and stop sign presence. Steering individual SAE latents produces predictable, monotonic chang
    Open source S3

What remains unknown

Not established in the collected evidence: Environment, Control, Data origin.

Reported performance applies to the described task. It does not establish general autonomy or deployment readiness.

Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

retable structure aligned with route intent, vehicle speed, and braking behavior, recovering route intent with 98.3% accuracy without supervision. Through paired counterfactual image edits, we further show that specific SAE features are visually grounded and systematically respond to scene changes such as traffic light state and stop sign presence. Steering individual SAE latents produces predictable, monotonic chang

Open source S3

es in planner outputs including lateral displacement, curvature, and braking. Finally, we demonstrate a practical application of these representations: we build a lightweight adapter trained on SAE latents that reduces trajectory selection error by 3.44%, outperforming an equivalent adapter that omits SAE latents, confirming that the sparse representation captures useful information for interpretability. Code and vis

Open source S4

ualizations are available at https://mgagvani.github.io/mechanistic-interpretability-for-e2e-driving/

Open source S5

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).