Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Prashant Kumar, Rachael Granberry, Taylor Niehues, Andrew A. Stanley, Gabe Pirie·· 6 days agoSignalEditorial score75

PACT: Pose-Robust Actuation Co-Design for Tendon-Driven Robotic Hands

PACT: Pose-Robust Actuation Co-Design for Tendon-Driven Robotic Hands

Summary

This paper introduces the PACT framework, which co-designs tendon routing, moment arms, and capstan dimensions for human-scale robotic hands. By optimizing these parameters under pose-dependent force requirements and drivetrain-bandwidth constraints, the method achieves a task-force coverage of 0.88-1.00 across eight poses and a predicted minimum isolated-joint flexion/extension bandwidth of 5 Hz within a 70th-percentile human-size envelope. Applied to a four-degree-of-freedom finger using quasi-direct-drive actuators, the framework produces an asymmetric N + 1 tendon topology. Prototype measurements deviate from predictions by up to 24.5%, primarily due to unmodeled transmission losses, indicating that co-designing routing with the drivetrain can meet performance requirements without relaxing bandwidth constraints.

Editorial context

The study proposes a co-design framework for tendon-driven robotic hands that optimizes routing and actuation dimensions to meet pose-dependent force requirements while maintaining bandwidth constraints, with prototype measurements showing deviations up to 24.5% from predictions due to unmodeled transmission losses.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • task-force coverage

    0.88–1

    View original evidence
    rage at the weakest pose. Applied to a four-degree-of-freedom finger, the framework produces an asymmetric N + 1 tendon topology using quasi-direct-drive actuators. Across eight poses, the design achieves task-force coverage of 0.88-1.00 and a predicted 5 Hz minimum isolated-joint flexion/extension bandwidth within a 70th-percentile human-size envelope. Prototype measurements deviate from predictions by up to 24.5%,
    Open source S4
  • task-force coverage

    1

    View original evidence
    rage at the weakest pose. Applied to a four-degree-of-freedom finger, the framework produces an asymmetric N + 1 tendon topology using quasi-direct-drive actuators. Across eight poses, the design achieves task-force coverage of 0.88-1.00 and a predicted 5 Hz minimum isolated-joint flexion/extension bandwidth within a 70th-percentile human-size envelope. Prototype measurements deviate from predictions by up to 24.5%,
    Open source S4
  • minimum isolated-joint flexion/extension bandwidth

    5

    View original evidence
    rage at the weakest pose. Applied to a four-degree-of-freedom finger, the framework produces an asymmetric N + 1 tendon topology using quasi-direct-drive actuators. Across eight poses, the design achieves task-force coverage of 0.88-1.00 and a predicted 5 Hz minimum isolated-joint flexion/extension bandwidth within a 70th-percentile human-size envelope. Prototype measurements deviate from predictions by up to 24.5%,
    Open source S4
  • prototype deviation from predictions

    ≤24.5

    View original evidence
    rage at the weakest pose. Applied to a four-degree-of-freedom finger, the framework produces an asymmetric N + 1 tendon topology using quasi-direct-drive actuators. Across eight poses, the design achieves task-force coverage of 0.88-1.00 and a predicted 5 Hz minimum isolated-joint flexion/extension bandwidth within a 70th-percentile human-size envelope. Prototype measurements deviate from predictions by up to 24.5%,
    Open source S4
  • number of poses evaluated

    8

    Reported trials

    View original evidence
    rage at the weakest pose. Applied to a four-degree-of-freedom finger, the framework produces an asymmetric N + 1 tendon topology using quasi-direct-drive actuators. Across eight poses, the design achieves task-force coverage of 0.88-1.00 and a predicted 5 Hz minimum isolated-joint flexion/extension bandwidth within a 70th-percentile human-size envelope. Prototype measurements deviate from predictions by up to 24.5%,
    Open source S4
  • degrees of freedom per finger

    4

    View original evidence
    rage at the weakest pose. Applied to a four-degree-of-freedom finger, the framework produces an asymmetric N + 1 tendon topology using quasi-direct-drive actuators. Across eight poses, the design achieves task-force coverage of 0.88-1.00 and a predicted 5 Hz minimum isolated-joint flexion/extension bandwidth within a 70th-percentile human-size envelope. Prototype measurements deviate from predictions by up to 24.5%,
    Open source S4
  • human-size envelope percentile

    70

    View original evidence
    rage at the weakest pose. Applied to a four-degree-of-freedom finger, the framework produces an asymmetric N + 1 tendon topology using quasi-direct-drive actuators. Across eight poses, the design achieves task-force coverage of 0.88-1.00 and a predicted 5 Hz minimum isolated-joint flexion/extension bandwidth within a 70th-percentile human-size envelope. Prototype measurements deviate from predictions by up to 24.5%,
    Open source S4
  • number of tendons in topology

    1

    View original evidence
    rage at the weakest pose. Applied to a four-degree-of-freedom finger, the framework produces an asymmetric N + 1 tendon topology using quasi-direct-drive actuators. Across eight poses, the design achieves task-force coverage of 0.88-1.00 and a predicted 5 Hz minimum isolated-joint flexion/extension bandwidth within a 70th-percentile human-size envelope. Prototype measurements deviate from predictions by up to 24.5%,
    Open source S4
  • paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

rage at the weakest pose. Applied to a four-degree-of-freedom finger, the framework produces an asymmetric N + 1 tendon topology using quasi-direct-drive actuators. Across eight poses, the design achieves task-force coverage of 0.88-1.00 and a predicted 5 Hz minimum isolated-joint flexion/extension bandwidth within a 70th-percentile human-size envelope. Prototype measurements deviate from predictions by up to 24.5%,

Open source S4

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).