Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Benjamin Pikus, Daniel Saunders, Mircea Mironenco, Salman Mohammadi, Mathew Mathew, Sirou Zhu, Divya Makkar, Xuhua Huang, Qinbo Li, Supreeth Narasimhaswamy, Siyuan Cen, Thomas Neff, Dejia Xu, Shyamal Buch·· 13 hours agoSignalEditorial score85

Pretraining Knows What, Simulation Teaches How: Compositional Generalization in a Sim-Trained Robot Agent

Pretraining Knows What, Simulation Teaches How: Compositional Generalization in a Sim-Trained Robot Agent

Summary

This research introduces ZAP, a robot policy that uses a pretrained 27B parameter vision-language model to control a robot via a simple tool harness. Trained on simulated tasks, ZAP achieves 96.7% success on real-world tasks, outperforming existing models like MolmoAct2 and GPT-6 Astra in efficiency and cost. It also generalizes to new objects, goals, and strategies, and transfers to an unseen embodiment with 55.9% performance on RoboLab-120.

Editorial context

The paper introduces ZAP, a robot policy that leverages a pretrained vision-language model to achieve high success rates in real-world tasks without real-world training data. It demonstrates generalization to novel objects and tasks, and cross-embodiment transfer to a Franka arm.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • performance comparison

    3

    View original evidence
    standing and reasoning, followed by supervised fine-tuning and GRPO on simple simulated tasks to teach it how to move the robot. Without any real-world robot data during training, ZAP reaches 96.7% success on real-world tasks, matching GPT-6 Astra in our harness and outperforming the MolmoAct2 VLA (33.3%), while running 3x faster and 17x cheaper than GPT-6 Astra. We demonstrate that ZAP also generalizes to completely
    Open source S3
  • performance comparison

    17

    View original evidence
    standing and reasoning, followed by supervised fine-tuning and GRPO on simple simulated tasks to teach it how to move the robot. Without any real-world robot data during training, ZAP reaches 96.7% success on real-world tasks, matching GPT-6 Astra in our harness and outperforming the MolmoAct2 VLA (33.3%), while running 3x faster and 17x cheaper than GPT-6 Astra. We demonstrate that ZAP also generalizes to completely
    Open source S3
  • paper: not_reported
  • code: not_reported
  • weights: not_reported
  • dataset: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

standing and reasoning, followed by supervised fine-tuning and GRPO on simple simulated tasks to teach it how to move the robot. Without any real-world robot data during training, ZAP reaches 96.7% success on real-world tasks, matching GPT-6 Astra in our harness and outperforming the MolmoAct2 VLA (33.3%), while running 3x faster and 17x cheaper than GPT-6 Astra. We demonstrate that ZAP also generalizes to completely

Open source S3

new objects, goals, strategies, and language by seating a test tube in a rack (and choosing a different hole in the rack when prompted), handing a test tube between arms mid-air, drawing an X on a tic-tac-toe board, and playing chess. These goals and types of manipulation don't appear in our training data. Furthermore, ZAP also transfers to an unseen embodiment. On a single-arm Franka, ZAP reaches 55.9% on RoboLab-1

Open source S4

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).