Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Leo Benaharon, Chi Zhang, Wei Zheng, Weifan Zhang, Yifan Wei, Yong Sun·· 15 days agoSignalEditorial score75

Program-Level Adversarial Co-Adaptive Self-Play for Robotic Security

Program-Level Adversarial Co-Adaptive Self-Play for Robotic Security

Summary

This research presents a framework for program-level adversarial co-adaptive self-play, where coding agents generate attacks and defenses from tested opponent code and mission feedback without model fine-tuning. The study includes two eight-generation case studies showing that while the framework enables local task recovery in autonomous driving and humanoid locomotion scenarios, it does not establish sustained robustness against evolving opponents.

Editorial context

The paper introduces a framework for program-level adversarial co-adaptive self-play where coding agents generate attacks and defenses without model fine-tuning, demonstrating local task recovery in autonomous driving and humanoid locomotion scenarios but noting that sustained robustness is not established.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

  • paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

arXiv:2610.36143v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Coding agents can adapt robotic software by revising executable programs, but successful responses to an evolving opponent may not remain effective. We present a framework for program-level adversarial co-adaptive self-play in which coding agents generate attacks and defenses from tested opponent code and mission feedback, without model fine-tuning. Environment-spec

Open source S2

ific interfaces support external programs for autonomous driving and SDK-level defenses for humanoid locomotion. Two eight-generation case studies reveal concrete software responses: a driving defender introduces direct-actuation recovery, while a humanoid defender revises incoming-state validation. These responses provide local task recovery but do not establish sustained robustness. The framework makes such adaptat

Open source S3

ion and limitations observable through executable artifacts and task-level evidence.

Open source S4

Program-Level Adversarial Co-Adaptive Self-Play for Robotic Security

Open source S1

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).