Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Pengfei Zhou, Yixing Ma, Zhengfeiyang Zhang, Haoyuan Chen, Zhenglin Wan, Hexin Wang, Wangbo Zhao, Yang You·· 8 hours agoSignalEditorial score75

REA: A Routed Embodied Agent Runtime for Asynchronous Brain-Cerebellum Control

REA: A Routed Embodied Agent Runtime for Asynchronous Brain-Cerebellum Control

Summary

This research presents REA (Routed Embodied Agent), a unified runtime system that enables asynchronous coordination between deliberative foundation models and fast reactive policies. The system employs a route memory, boundary-triggered judge gates, and shared-budget escalation to prevent slow brain queries from stalling execution. Evaluated on 3,000 test episodes across 60 LIBERO-Pro tasks, REA achieves 95.9% success, outperforming the best single-agent baseline (94.7%) while reducing control steps by 25% and control time by 17%. In a separate study on RoboTwin 2.0, REA reaches 84% success with VLA policies and 86% with VLA+code, compared to 80% for the strongest single VLA baseline (MEDex). The approach also transfers to BEHAVIOR-1K and a real Unitree G1 humanoid robot.

Editorial context

The paper introduces REA, a runtime architecture designed to coordinate slow deliberative foundation models with fast reactive policies without stalling execution, evaluated on LIBERO-Pro and RoboTwin benchmarks.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • test episodes

    3,000

    Reported trials

    View original evidence
    escalation ladder for bounded recovery. Evaluated on 3,000 test episodes across 60 LIBERO-Pro tasks, REA reaches 95.9% success and beats the best single-agent baseline in its own policy pool (94.7%) while reducing control steps by 25% and control time by 17%. In a separate 100-episode RoboTwin 2.0 study, REA achieves 84% success with VLA policies and 86% with VLA+code, compared with 80% for the strongest single VLA
    Open source S5
  • LIBERO-Pro tasks

    60

    View original evidence
    escalation ladder for bounded recovery. Evaluated on 3,000 test episodes across 60 LIBERO-Pro tasks, REA reaches 95.9% success and beats the best single-agent baseline in its own policy pool (94.7%) while reducing control steps by 25% and control time by 17%. In a separate 100-episode RoboTwin 2.0 study, REA achieves 84% success with VLA policies and 86% with VLA+code, compared with 80% for the strongest single VLA
    Open source S5
  • paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

escalation ladder for bounded recovery. Evaluated on 3,000 test episodes across 60 LIBERO-Pro tasks, REA reaches 95.9% success and beats the best single-agent baseline in its own policy pool (94.7%) while reducing control steps by 25% and control time by 17%. In a separate 100-episode RoboTwin 2.0 study, REA achieves 84% success with VLA policies and 86% with VLA+code, compared with 80% for the strongest single VLA

Open source S5

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).