Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Huanan Liu, Ye Li, Kangye Ji, Xiaoyu Chen, Hanyun Cui, Yutian Shen, Yuan Meng, Chenglei Wu, Jingyan Jiang, Bo Li, Zhi Wang·· 1 days agoEditorial score68

RealtimeWAM: How Fast Can I Run My World Action Model?

RealtimeWAM: How Fast Can I Run My World Action Model?

Summary

This paper presents RealtimeWAM, a general, training-free framework for low-latency inference in World Action Models (WAMs). It addresses the high inference latency of WAMs by coordinating parallel execution with adaptive computation, overlapping observation processing with prediction, and selectively reusing cached features. Evaluated on FastWAM and OpenWAM across RoboTwin, LIBERO, and LIBERO-Plus, RealtimeWAM achieves speedups of 8.90× and 10.67× with average success rates of 82.75% and 87.41%, respectively.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • mean inference latencies

    24.09

    View original evidence
    measured mean inference latencies are 24.09 and 63.09 ms
    Open source S5
  • mean inference latencies

    63.09

    View original evidence
    measured mean inference latencies are 24.09 and 63.09 ms
    Open source S5
  • average speedups

    8.9

    View original evidence
    average speedups of 8.90$\times$ and 10.67$\times$
    Open source S5
  • average speedups

    10.67

    View original evidence
    average speedups of 8.90$\times$ and 10.67$\times$
    Open source S5
  • average success rates

    82.75

    View original evidence
    Average success rates are 82.75% and 87.41%
    Open source S5
  • average success rates

    87.41

    View original evidence
    Average success rates are 82.75% and 87.41%
    Open source S5
  • improves average success rates

    17.2

    View original evidence
    RealtimeWAM improves average success rates over native inference by 17.2 and 37.2 percentage points on FastWAM and OpenWAM
    Open source S5
  • improves average success rates

    37.2

    View original evidence
    RealtimeWAM improves average success rates over native inference by 17.2 and 37.2 percentage points on FastWAM and OpenWAM
    Open source S5

What remains unknown

Not established in the collected evidence: Environment, Control, Data origin.

Reported performance applies to the described task. It does not establish general autonomy or deployment readiness.

Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

lus. On an RTX 4090, measured mean inference latencies are 24.09 and 63.09 ms, corresponding to average speedups of 8.90$\times$ and 10.67$\times$. Average success rates are 82.75% and 87.41%, respectively, within 0.02 and 0.53 percentage points of native inference. Across five real-world tasks, RealtimeWAM improves average success rates over native inference by 17.2 and 37.2 percentage points on FastWAM and OpenWAM,

Open source S5

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).