Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Ali Taheri, Alireza Taban, Qizhou Wang, Wanhua Li·· 4 hours agoSignalEditorial score88

Refuse the Harm, Complete the Task via Graph-of-Rules Planning for LLM-Enabled Robots

Refuse the Harm, Complete the Task via Graph-of-Rules Planning for LLM-Enabled Robots

Summary

This research presents RuleGraph, a multi-agent Graph-of-Rules planning framework that allows LLM-enabled robots to reject harmful parts of instructions while completing legitimate tasks. The method distributes safety enforcement across multiple reasoning stages, achieving 0% attack success rate and high task success rates on benchmark environments.

Editorial context

This paper introduces RuleGraph, a multi-agent planning framework that enables LLM-enabled robots to safely complete tasks by rejecting harmful sub-tasks while executing legitimate ones. The approach reduces reliance on centralized safety decisions and achieves high task success rates across benchmark environments.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • Reported success rate

    0%

    View original evidence
    nchmarks in two environments using Attack Success Rate (ASR) and Task Success Rate (TSR). RuleGraph reduces ASR to 0% on both benchmarks while achieving the highest TSR among all methods, reaching 98.57% on the RoboGuard benchmark and 84.54% on our long-horizon compound instructions.
    Open source S6
  • benchmark

    0

    View original evidence
    nchmarks in two environments using Attack Success Rate (ASR) and Task Success Rate (TSR). RuleGraph reduces ASR to 0% on both benchmarks while achieving the highest TSR among all methods, reaching 98.57% on the RoboGuard benchmark and 84.54% on our long-horizon compound instructions.
    Open source S6
  • environment

    0

    View original evidence
    nchmarks in two environments using Attack Success Rate (ASR) and Task Success Rate (TSR). RuleGraph reduces ASR to 0% on both benchmarks while achieving the highest TSR among all methods, reaching 98.57% on the RoboGuard benchmark and 84.54% on our long-horizon compound instructions.
    Open source S6
  • method

    0

    View original evidence
    nchmarks in two environments using Attack Success Rate (ASR) and Task Success Rate (TSR). RuleGraph reduces ASR to 0% on both benchmarks while achieving the highest TSR among all methods, reaching 98.57% on the RoboGuard benchmark and 84.54% on our long-horizon compound instructions.
    Open source S6
  • paper: not_reported
  • code: not_reported
  • weights: not_reported
  • dataset: not_reported

What remains unknown

Not established in the collected evidence: Environment, Control, Data origin.

Reported performance applies to the described task. It does not establish general autonomy or deployment readiness.

Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

nchmarks in two environments using Attack Success Rate (ASR) and Task Success Rate (TSR). RuleGraph reduces ASR to 0% on both benchmarks while achieving the highest TSR among all methods, reaching 98.57% on the RoboGuard benchmark and 84.54% on our long-horizon compound instructions.

Open source S6

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).