Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Zequan Zeng, Kai Wang, Delvin Ce Zhang, Huaping Liu, Zhipeng Yuan, Junqin Yang, YunLong Zhang·· 1 days agoSignalEditorial score75

Robo-MLT: Dual-System Robotic Manipulation for Long-Horizon Medical Laboratory Tasks

Robo-MLT: Dual-System Robotic Manipulation for Long-Horizon Medical Laboratory Tasks

Summary

This research introduces Robo-MLT, a framework that couples explicit workflow monitoring with learned action generation to handle long-horizon medical laboratory tasks. The system uses a vision-language planner to compose atomic skill sequences and a multiframe execution monitor to detect task completion or infeasibility, triggering replanning when necessary. Evaluated on blood gas analysis and sample tube sorting with 50 nominal configurations per method and 20 sample-removal configurations, Robo-MLT achieves 82% and 70% task success rates respectively, outperforming baseline policies by 30 and 22 percentage points. The system demonstrates the ability to revise plans after operator intervention, such as removing a handled sample, indicating improved reliability and recoverability for complex laboratory workflows.

Editorial context

The study evaluates a dual-system framework combining explicit workflow monitoring with learned action generation on specific medical laboratory tasks, reporting task success rates of 82% and 70% against baselines under tested conditions involving sample removal.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • percentage points improvement over baseline

    30

    View original evidence
    ime coordinates it with the monitor. We evaluate Robo-MLT against four policy baselines and a VLM-based monitor baseline on blood gas analysis and blood sample tube sorting, with 50 nominal configurations per method and 20 sample-removal configurations. Robo-MLT achieves task success rates of 82\% and 70\%, exceeding $\pi_{0.5}$ by 30 and 22 percentage points, respectively. After an operator removes the sample being
    Open source S4
  • percentage points improvement over baseline

    22

    View original evidence
    ime coordinates it with the monitor. We evaluate Robo-MLT against four policy baselines and a VLM-based monitor baseline on blood gas analysis and blood sample tube sorting, with 50 nominal configurations per method and 20 sample-removal configurations. Robo-MLT achieves task success rates of 82\% and 70\%, exceeding $\pi_{0.5}$ by 30 and 22 percentage points, respectively. After an operator removes the sample being
    Open source S4
  • nominal configurations per method

    50

    View original evidence
    ime coordinates it with the monitor. We evaluate Robo-MLT against four policy baselines and a VLM-based monitor baseline on blood gas analysis and blood sample tube sorting, with 50 nominal configurations per method and 20 sample-removal configurations. Robo-MLT achieves task success rates of 82\% and 70\%, exceeding $\pi_{0.5}$ by 30 and 22 percentage points, respectively. After an operator removes the sample being
    Open source S4
  • sample-removal configurations

    20

    View original evidence
    ime coordinates it with the monitor. We evaluate Robo-MLT against four policy baselines and a VLM-based monitor baseline on blood gas analysis and blood sample tube sorting, with 50 nominal configurations per method and 20 sample-removal configurations. Robo-MLT achieves task success rates of 82\% and 70\%, exceeding $\pi_{0.5}$ by 30 and 22 percentage points, respectively. After an operator removes the sample being
    Open source S4
  • paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

ime coordinates it with the monitor. We evaluate Robo-MLT against four policy baselines and a VLM-based monitor baseline on blood gas analysis and blood sample tube sorting, with 50 nominal configurations per method and 20 sample-removal configurations. Robo-MLT achieves task success rates of 82\% and 70\%, exceeding $\pi_{0.5}$ by 30 and 22 percentage points, respectively. After an operator removes the sample being

Open source S4

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).