Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Buzhao Liu, Jianing Ye, Xiu Yuan, Yangtong Feng, Chengsong Huang, Tyler Dinh, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Ning Zhang, Chongjie Zhang·· 3 hours agoSignalEditorial score85

RoboAuto: Autonomous Robot Program Search through Multi-Level Physical Understanding

RoboAuto: Autonomous Robot Program Search through Multi-Level Physical Understanding

Summary

This paper presents RoboAuto, a framework for autonomous robot program search that explicitly incorporates physical understanding at the object, scene, and interaction levels. It combines a hierarchical knowledge base with scene grounding and multi-stage planning to improve performance on robotic manipulation tasks. RoboAuto achieves an 89.1% success rate on short-horizon LIBERO-PRO tasks and outperforms existing methods on long-horizon real-robot tasks.

Editorial context

RoboAuto introduces a framework for autonomous robot program search that integrates multi-level physical understanding, improving success rates on both simulated and real-world tasks compared to existing methods.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • Reported success rate

    89.1%

    View original evidence
    physical effects and actively tests competing hypotheses to resolve physical uncertainties. RoboAuto achieves superior performance across five benchmark families, attaining an 89.1% success rate on short-horizon LIBERO-PRO tasks and more than twice the mean success rate of ASPIRE on LIBERO-PRO Long and LIBERO-Plus. It also outperforms ASPIRE and $\pi_{0.5}$ on three challenging long-horizon real-robot tasks requiring
    Open source S5
  • paper: not_reported
  • code: not_reported
  • weights: not_reported
  • dataset: not_reported

What remains unknown

Not established in the collected evidence: Environment, Control, Data origin.

Reported performance applies to the described task. It does not establish general autonomy or deployment readiness.

Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

physical effects and actively tests competing hypotheses to resolve physical uncertainties. RoboAuto achieves superior performance across five benchmark families, attaining an 89.1% success rate on short-horizon LIBERO-PRO tasks and more than twice the mean success rate of ASPIRE on LIBERO-PRO Long and LIBERO-Plus. It also outperforms ASPIRE and $\pi_{0.5}$ on three challenging long-horizon real-robot tasks requiring

Open source S5

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).