Robots in the City: Persona-Based Perceptions of Urban Robots
Robots in the City: Persona-Based Perceptions of Urban Robots
This research examines how the presence and type of robots affect perceived safety in urban environments.
The study uses synthetic persona-conditioned multimodal large language models and human respondents to evaluate how robot presence affects perceived safety in urban settings, finding that model preferences diverge from human judgments regarding humanoid versus delivery robots.
Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗
Loading article text…
What the source reports
Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.
Reported numbers
images
18
View original evidence
arXiv:2611.05954v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pedestrians increasingly encounter robots in urban public spaces without interacting with them, but how robots change the perceived safety of a street remains unclear. We examine how robot presence and type affect perceived safety across urban contexts. We generate 18 images of Seoul streets that vary in time of day, road class, and robot condition (no robot, a delive
Open source S2personas
500
View original evidence
ry robot, or a humanoid). Two multimodal large language models (MLLMs), Qwen3.8-27B and Gemma4-26B, each conditioned on 500 synthetic personas, choose the safer image in each pair, and 25 human respondents complete the same task. Both models prefer streets without robots and favor the delivery robot over the humanoid. Robots are chosen more often at night and less often by older personas, whereas road class has small
Open source S3human respondents
25
View original evidence
ry robot, or a humanoid). Two multimodal large language models (MLLMs), Qwen3.8-27B and Gemma4-26B, each conditioned on 500 synthetic personas, choose the safer image in each pair, and 25 human respondents complete the same task. Both models prefer streets without robots and favor the delivery robot over the humanoid. Robots are chosen more often at night and less often by older personas, whereas road class has small
Open source S3models
2
View original evidence
ry robot, or a humanoid). Two multimodal large language models (MLLMs), Qwen3.8-27B and Gemma4-26B, each conditioned on 500 synthetic personas, choose the safer image in each pair, and 25 human respondents complete the same task. Both models prefer streets without robots and favor the delivery robot over the humanoid. Robots are chosen more often at night and less often by older personas, whereas road class has small
Open source S3
- paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record
Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.
arXiv:2611.05954v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pedestrians increasingly encounter robots in urban public spaces without interacting with them, but how robots change the perceived safety of a street remains unclear. We examine how robot presence and type affect perceived safety across urban contexts. We generate 18 images of Seoul streets that vary in time of day, road class, and robot condition (no robot, a delive
Open source S2
ry robot, or a humanoid). Two multimodal large language models (MLLMs), Qwen3.8-27B and Gemma4-26B, each conditioned on 500 synthetic personas, choose the safer image in each pair, and 25 human respondents complete the same task. Both models prefer streets without robots and favor the delivery robot over the humanoid. Robots are chosen more often at night and less often by older personas, whereas road class has small
Open source S3
Source：arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org