Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Haesung Lee, Insu Han·· 8 hours agoSignalEditorial score75

SACQ: Structure-Aware Codebook Quantization for Ultra-Low-Bit Vision-Language-Action Models

SACQ: Structure-Aware Codebook Quantization for Ultra-Low-Bit Vision-Language-Action Models

Summary

This paper introduces SACQ, a weight-only vector-codebook quantization framework designed for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models to enable deployment on resource-constrained robotic platforms. The method employs structure-aware codebook fitting, action-aware mixed-bit allocation, and two-stage post-quantization refinement. Evaluated on the GR00T N1.7 model, SACQ achieves 93.85% average success across four LIBERO suites at 1.5 bits per language/action weight, reducing memory footprint by 4.83x. It also retains 93.55% success with INT8 activation quantization while running 1.51x faster than BF16. On the SimplER benchmark, it achieves 63.76% and 52.27% success under Visual Matching and Variant Aggregation at 2 bits per weight, outperforming BF16 baselines.

Editorial context

The authors present SACQ, a quantization framework for Vision-Language-Action models that claims to maintain high success rates on the LIBERO and SimplER benchmarks while significantly reducing memory usage and improving inference speed compared to BF16 baselines.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • memory reduction factor

    4.83

    View original evidence
    el memory by 4.83x. With INT8 activation quantization and low-precision attention, it retains 93.55% success while running 1.51x faster than BF16. On SimplER, SACQ further achieves 63.76% and 52.27% success under Visual Matching and Variant Aggregation at 2 bits per language/action weight, compared to 58.90% and 53.45% for BF16, respectively.
    Open source S5
  • speedup factor

    1.51

    View original evidence
    el memory by 4.83x. With INT8 activation quantization and low-precision attention, it retains 93.55% success while running 1.51x faster than BF16. On SimplER, SACQ further achieves 63.76% and 52.27% success under Visual Matching and Variant Aggregation at 2 bits per language/action weight, compared to 58.90% and 53.45% for BF16, respectively.
    Open source S5
  • bits per language/action weight

    1.5

    View original evidence
    allocation based on the increase in final-action error as individual layers are compressed; and (3) two-stage post-quantization refinement that reassigns codeword indices with second-order error compensation and calibrates codebooks and row-group scales against the decoded action. Using GR00T N1.7, SACQ achieves 93.85% average success across four LIBERO suites at 1.5 bits per language/action weight while reducing mod
    Open source S4
  • bits per language/action weight

    2

    View original evidence
    el memory by 4.83x. With INT8 activation quantization and low-precision attention, it retains 93.55% success while running 1.51x faster than BF16. On SimplER, SACQ further achieves 63.76% and 52.27% success under Visual Matching and Variant Aggregation at 2 bits per language/action weight, compared to 58.90% and 53.45% for BF16, respectively.
    Open source S5
  • paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

allocation based on the increase in final-action error as individual layers are compressed; and (3) two-stage post-quantization refinement that reassigns codeword indices with second-order error compensation and calibrates codebooks and row-group scales against the decoded action. Using GR00T N1.7, SACQ achieves 93.85% average success across four LIBERO suites at 1.5 bits per language/action weight while reducing mod

Open source S4

el memory by 4.83x. With INT8 activation quantization and low-precision attention, it retains 93.55% success while running 1.51x faster than BF16. On SimplER, SACQ further achieves 63.76% and 52.27% success under Visual Matching and Variant Aggregation at 2 bits per language/action weight, compared to 58.90% and 53.45% for BF16, respectively.

Open source S5

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).