Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Fuyi Chen·· 1 days agoSignalEditorial score75

Same Path, Less Time: Training-Free Fast Execution of Vision-Language-Action Models under Inference Latency

Same Path, Less Time: Training-Free Fast Execution of Vision-Language-Action Models under Inference Latency

Summary

This research presents Path-preserving Time Scaling (PTS), a training-free execution layer designed for frozen vision-language-action (VLA) models to mitigate the time wasted during inference and slow demonstration speeds.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • model-suite combinations tested

    6

    View original evidence
    under injected inference latency, PTS raises task throughput over the strongest deployable baseline by 33% for pi0.5 and 104% for SmolVLA while matching or improving the success rate, is best on all six model-suite combinations, and exceeds zero-latency 1x execution. Against asynchronous 1x execution with the same one-step decoder, the time layer alone adds 28% and 38%. On LIBERO-Dynamic it improves on stop-and-wait
    Open source S5
  • inference latency condition

    1

    View original evidence
    arXiv:2611.01390v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language-action (VLA) models predict chunks of future actions, yet deployed robots waste time in two ways that are independent of model capability: they halt while the next chunk is inferred, and they move at the speed of slow, cautious demonstrations. Existing remedies remove one loss each, and stacking them fails, because asynchrony and speed-up each change the
    Open source S2
  • paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

under injected inference latency, PTS raises task throughput over the strongest deployable baseline by 33% for pi0.5 and 104% for SmolVLA while matching or improving the success rate, is best on all six model-suite combinations, and exceeds zero-latency 1x execution. Against asynchronous 1x execution with the same one-step decoder, the time layer alone adds 28% and 38%. On LIBERO-Dynamic it improves on stop-and-wait

Open source S5

execution by 38% and is comparable to asynchronous 1x execution.

Open source S6

ss consumed during inference. A time layer sums the planned increments, keeps the arm at 1x while the gripper moves, and caps the rate by the actuator's linear range and by chunk feasibility under latency. We show that misaligned entry and stochastic sampling add a bias and a variance to the continuation error, and derive a break-even success rate that states when speeding up pays off. On LIBERO with two frozen VLAs

Open source S4

arXiv:2611.01390v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language-action (VLA) models predict chunks of future actions, yet deployed robots waste time in two ways that are independent of model capability: they halt while the next chunk is inferred, and they move at the speed of slow, cautious demonstrations. Existing remedies remove one loss each, and stacking them fails, because asynchrony and speed-up each change the

Open source S2

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).