Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Kaiwen Hong, Shaoting Peng, Xiangyu Zeng, Pengcheng Wang, Boyuan Tian, Haonan Chen, Yifan Zhu, Yixiao Wang, Katherine Driggs-Campbell·· 1 days agoSignalEditorial score82

Self-Labeled Preference Transfer for Steerable Robot Manipulation

Self-Labeled Preference Transfer for Steerable Robot Manipulation

Summary

This research proposes Self-Labeled Preference Transfer (SPT), a method that allows robot policies to adapt to new tasks without requiring manual preference annotations. SPT uses a shared vision-language backbone to recognize preferences from annotated source demonstrations and self-labels target demonstrations for fine-tuning. In simulation, SPT achieves 84.8% preference following and 89.2% task success, compared to 59.4% and 88.0% for naive fine-tuning. In real-world experiments, SPT improves preference following from 52.5% to 92.5% relative to naive fine-tuning across two task transfers.

Editorial context

This paper introduces Self-Labeled Preference Transfer (SPT), a method that enables robot policies to adapt to new tasks without manual preference annotations. By leveraging a shared vision-language backbone for preference recognition and self-labeling target demonstrations, SPT achieves improved performance in both simulation and real-world settings compared to naive fine-tuning.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • Reported accuracy

    96.4%

    View original evidence
    a shared vision-language backbone for preference-conditioned action prediction and preference recognition on annotated source demonstrations. It then freezes the recognizer to preserve its cross-task preference recognition capability and uses it to self-label target demonstrations for policy fine-tuning. Across five types of execution preferences in simulation, the recognizer achieves 96.4% accuracy, and SPT reaches
    Open source S4
  • paper: not_reported
  • code: not_reported
  • weights: not_reported
  • dataset: not_reported

What remains unknown

Not established in the collected evidence: Environment, Control, Data origin.

Reported performance applies to the described task. It does not establish general autonomy or deployment readiness.

Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

a shared vision-language backbone for preference-conditioned action prediction and preference recognition on annotated source demonstrations. It then freezes the recognizer to preserve its cross-task preference recognition capability and uses it to self-label target demonstrations for policy fine-tuning. Across five types of execution preferences in simulation, the recognizer achieves 96.4% accuracy, and SPT reaches

Open source S4

84.8% preference following and 89.2% task success, compared with 59.4% and 88.0% for naive finetuning. We further extend to multiple preferences, achieving 93.8% preference following compared with 42.5% of baselines. In real-world experiments, SPT increases preference following from 52.5% to 92.5% relative to naive finetuning across two task transfers. These results show that SPT can support preference adaptation ac

Open source S5

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).