Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Amit Jadhav, Shaurya Beriwala, David Q. Liu, Yanfei Liu·· 2 days agoSignalEditorial score75

Streaming Failure Forecasting: VLA Failure Monitors That Keep Learning After Deployment

Streaming Failure Forecasting: VLA Failure Monitors That Keep Learning After Deployment

Summary

This research presents Streaming Failure Forecasting (SFF), a method for vision-language-action (VLA) policies that maintains failure monitoring accuracy after deployment by refitting only the final linear layer of its network using success/failure labels from each episode. Unlike traditional approaches that freeze monitors offline, SFF adapts to unannounced task switches and policy updates on real SO-101 arms and in simulation, ranking failures better than frozen or reset-based baselines while operating at 2.18 ms per call on a Jetson CPU core.

Editorial context

The paper introduces Streaming Failure Forecasting (SFF), a method that refits only the final linear layer of a failure monitor after each episode to adapt to task or policy changes in VLA systems, achieving better failure ranking than frozen monitors on simulated drift and real-robot runs.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

  • paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).