There remains no true general purpose robotics model -- not even from OpenAI
There remains no true general purpose robotics model -- not even from OpenAI
Source: Chris Paxton — X Robotics · Read original article ↗
Article text · Original source · English
There remains no true general purpose robotics model -- not even from OpenAI
What the source reports
Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.
Reported numbers
comparisons
901
View original evidence
In 901 head-to-head comparisons, AI agents made more progress in 394 runs, VLA models led in 265 runs, and 242 runs were ties.
Open source S3AI agent wins
394
View original evidence
In 901 head-to-head comparisons, AI agents made more progress in 394 runs, VLA models led in 265 runs, and 242 runs were ties.
Open source S3VLA model wins
265
View original evidence
In 901 head-to-head comparisons, AI agents made more progress in 394 runs, VLA models led in 265 runs, and 242 runs were ties.
Open source S3ties
242
View original evidence
In 901 head-to-head comparisons, AI agents made more progress in 394 runs, VLA models led in 265 runs, and 242 runs were ties.
Open source S3
- paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record
Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.
In 901 head-to-head comparisons, AI agents made more progress in 394 runs, VLA models led in 265 runs, and 242 runs were ties.
Open source S3
There remains no true general purpose robotics model -- not even from OpenAI
Open source S1
【引用 @RoboColosseum】2/ General-purpose AI can compete with VLA models built for robots.
Open source S2
But results varied, so there’s no one-size-fits-all winner.
Open source S4
2/ General-purpose AI can compete with VLA models built for robots. In 901 head-to-head comparisons, AI agents made more progress in 394 runs, VLA models led in 265 runs, and 242 runs were ties. But results varied, so there’s no one-size-fits-all winner.View the quoted post on X
Source：Chris Paxton · x.com