UBTECH GPT-6 Astra Robot Fails Direct Control Bowl Stacking Test, Succeeds with Thinker-VLA and Thinker-WM Collaboration
GPT-6 Astra机器人实测翻车?优必选六组测试揭穿AI具身智能真相!
On April 18, 2026, UBTECH disclosed six mixed real-machine and simulation tests for its GPT-6 Astra robot. In a direct control task to stack three ceramic bowls, the robot failed due to a 0.3-second latency in posture adjustment, causing the second bowl to slip and the third to fall off the table. However, when switched to Thinker-VLA collaborative mode, which integrates UBTECH's self-developed vision-language-action model, the robot successfully stacked the bowls with an error less than 0.8 millimeters. Further tests showed that integrating Thinker-WM world model enabled predictive compensation for physical dynamics, reducing action planning time to 1.1 seconds. The tests highlight the limitations of large language models in physical interaction and demonstrate the value of collaborative systems incorporating small models that understand physical constraints.
Source: Chinese robotics — Robot learning research · Read original article ↗
English translation unavailable. Choose the original article to read it.
What the source reports
Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.
- Environment
- Controlled physical settingOpen source S2
Reported numbers
elapsed_hours
2.7 seconds
Unique elapsed hours
View original evidence
2026年春天,深圳南山科技园的实验室里没有掌声,只有一只银灰色机械臂悬在半空——它盯着面前叠得歪歪扭扭的三只陶瓷碗,停顿了2.7秒,然后缓缓收回。
Open source S2failure_logs
237
Trajectory count
Reported success rate
91.7%
View original evidence
在动态人流仿真中成功率91.7%,但遇到突然横穿的儿童虚拟模型时触发保守熔断——安全冗余,宁可停摆也不冒险; • 篮子搬运仿真?
Open source S14Reported accuracy
89%
- paper: not_reported
- code: not_reported
- weights: not_reported
- dataset: not_reported
What remains unknown
Not established in the collected evidence: Control, Data origin.
Reported performance applies to the described task. It does not establish general autonomy or deployment readiness.
Source excerpts and review record
Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.
2026年春天,深圳南山科技园的实验室里没有掌声,只有一只银灰色机械臂悬在半空——它盯着面前叠得歪歪扭扭的三只陶瓷碗,停顿了2.7秒,然后缓缓收回。
Open source S2
机械臂伸过去,指尖触到碗沿的瞬间,姿态微调滞后0.3秒,第二只碗滑脱,第三只干脆被推下桌面——系统日志冷静标记:‘Direct Control Failed’。
Open source S10
失败,但生成了237条失败归因日志,全部开源进优必选‘具身缺陷图谱’社区; • 结合世界模型叠碗?
Open source S16
在动态人流仿真中成功率91.7%,但遇到突然横穿的儿童虚拟模型时触发保守熔断——安全冗余,宁可停摆也不冒险; • 篮子搬运仿真?
Open source S14
首次实现跨场景泛化:从实验室地板迁移到模拟养老院瓷砖地,滑动预测准确率提升至89%; • 直接控制叠碗?
Open source S15
Source:Chinese robotics — Robot learning research · sohu.com