Skip to content
Trending eventHistorical event

AffectiveVLA: Safe and Intent-Aware VLA Control for Human-Humanoid Social Interaction

1 reports1 reporting sourcesUpdated 4 days ago

Overview

Event synthesis

This paper introduces AffectiveVLA, a Vision-Language-Action pipeline designed for safe social interaction between humanoids and humans. The system uses onboard cameras to infer interaction intent from RGB data, converting it into language prompts for the VLA policy. It features low-confidence suppression to prevent unintended motion execution and includes compliance profiles that adjust arm impedance during contact, alongside a voice-triggered safe-stop mechanism. The authors collected approximately 1,300 multimodal episodes via VR teleoperation to fine-tune four models: GR00T, RLDX-1, Being-H0.5, and UnifoLM-VLA-0. Evaluation on the Unitree G1 identified GR00T as the best standalone model, with intent recognition integration raising its macro-F1 score from 0.75 to 0.90 and achieving a p95 inference latency of 6.27 ms for the intent model.

Generated from attributed reports · Updated 2 days ago

Event evidence and corrections

0 attributed source owners. Ownership does not establish independent confirmation. Quantities are reported separately and are never added together.

Reported quantity · interaction episodes: 1300 other · reported trials
Supporting report

“ntent from two onboard cameras and converts it into a language prompt for the VLA policy. Low-confidence predictions suppress motion execution, reducing unintended activations. During physical contact, interaction-specific compliance profiles adjust arm impedance, while an independent voice-triggered mechanism initiates a latched safe-stop procedure. Using VR teleoperation, we collected approximately 1,300 multimodal”

Exact source · revision 1

Source owner not reported

Reported quantity · inference latency (p95): 6.27 other · Basis not reported
Supporting report

“interaction episodes and fine-tuned four VLA models: GR00T, RLDX-1, Being-H0.5, and UnifoLM-VLA-0. On-robot evaluation identifies GR00T as the best-performing standalone model. Integrating intent recognition increases its macro-F1 score from 0.75 to 0.90, while the intent model achieves a p95 inference latency of 6.27 ms. These results demonstrate that explicit intent gating improves the reliability of VLA-based soc”

Exact source · revision 1

Source owner not reported

Reported quantity · training data size: 1300 other · reported trials
Supporting report

“ntent from two onboard cameras and converts it into a language prompt for the VLA policy. Low-confidence predictions suppress motion execution, reducing unintended activations. During physical contact, interaction-specific compliance profiles adjust arm impedance, while an independent voice-triggered mechanism initiates a latched safe-stop procedure. Using VR teleoperation, we collected approximately 1,300 multimodal”

Exact source · revision 1

Source owner not reported

Report timeline

Follow attributed reports and material updates.

11/6
  1. arXiv Robotics — research abstractsSignal
    AffectiveVLA: Safe and Intent-Aware VLA Control for Human-Humanoid Social Interaction

    This paper introduces AffectiveVLA, a Vision-Language-Action pipeline designed for safe social interaction between humanoids and humans. The system uses onboard cameras to infer interaction intent from RGB data, converting it into language prompts for the VLA policy. It features low-confidence suppression to prevent unintended motion execution and includes compliance profiles that adjust arm impedance during contact, alongside a voice-triggered safe-stop mechanism. The authors collected approximately 1,300 multimodal episodes via VR teleoperation to fine-tune four models: GR00T, RLDX-1, Being-H0.5, and UnifoLM-VLA-0. Evaluation on the Unitree G1 identified GR00T as the best standalone model, with intent recognition integration raising its macro-F1 score from 0.75 to 0.90 and achieving a p95 inference latency of 6.27 ms for the intent model.

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).