Integrated Design and Reproducible Feasibility Analysis of a Four-Wheel Rover
Overview
Study presents an integrated rover design for NASA competition, analyzing mobility, sensor geometry, and command execution without physical trials. Software benchmarks and analytical models support reproducible verification.
From arXiv Robotics — research abstracts
Event evidence and corrections
0 attributed source owners. Ownership does not establish independent confirmation. Quantities are reported separately and are never added together.
Reported quantity · wheel rotating speed: 200 other · Basis not reported
“ystem that executes received imaging and ranging commands. The analysis reconciles component lists with dimensioned computer-aided design views, derives mobility and electrical constraints, and connects sensor geometry to command execution. At the estimated mass of 10.919 kg, a 215 mm wheel rotating at 200 RPM produces a theoretical rolling speed of 8.105 km/h; consequently, the nominal motor label does not establish”
Exact source · revision 1Source owner not reported
Reported quantity · theoretical rolling speed: 8.105 other · Basis not reported
“ystem that executes received imaging and ranging commands. The analysis reconciles component lists with dimensioned computer-aided design views, derives mobility and electrical constraints, and connects sensor geometry to command execution. At the estimated mass of 10.919 kg, a 215 mm wheel rotating at 200 RPM produces a theoretical rolling speed of 8.105 km/h; consequently, the nominal motor label does not establish”
Exact source · revision 1Source owner not reported
Reported quantity · mass: 10.919 other · Basis not reported
“ystem that executes received imaging and ranging commands. The analysis reconciles component lists with dimensioned computer-aided design views, derives mobility and electrical constraints, and connects sensor geometry to command execution. At the estimated mass of 10.919 kg, a 215 mm wheel rotating at 200 RPM produces a theoretical rolling speed of 8.105 km/h; consequently, the nominal motor label does not establish”
Exact source · revision 1Source owner not reported
Reported quantity · steering angle: 20 other · Basis not reported
“compliance with an 8 km/h design ceiling. A steady 20-degree climb requires at least 1.255 newton-meters per wheel under an assumed rolling-resistance coefficient of 0.10 and equal torque sharing. At 50 ft, an ideal 12-inch feature spans approximately 71 pixels across a full-resolution Camera Module 3 Standard image, while a 1-degree pointing error displaces the ranging ray by approximately 266 mm. An executed synth”
Exact source · revision 1Source owner not reported
Reported quantity · torque per wheel: 1.255 other · Basis not reported
“compliance with an 8 km/h design ceiling. A steady 20-degree climb requires at least 1.255 newton-meters per wheel under an assumed rolling-resistance coefficient of 0.10 and equal torque sharing. At 50 ft, an ideal 12-inch feature spans approximately 71 pixels across a full-resolution Camera Module 3 Standard image, while a 1-degree pointing error displaces the ranging ray by approximately 266 mm. An executed synth”
Exact source · revision 1Source owner not reported
Reported quantity · rolling-resistance coefficient: 0.1 other · Basis not reported
“compliance with an 8 km/h design ceiling. A steady 20-degree climb requires at least 1.255 newton-meters per wheel under an assumed rolling-resistance coefficient of 0.10 and equal torque sharing. At 50 ft, an ideal 12-inch feature spans approximately 71 pixels across a full-resolution Camera Module 3 Standard image, while a 1-degree pointing error displaces the ranging ray by approximately 266 mm. An executed synth”
Exact source · revision 1Source owner not reported
Reported quantity · feature size: 12 other · Basis not reported
“compliance with an 8 km/h design ceiling. A steady 20-degree climb requires at least 1.255 newton-meters per wheel under an assumed rolling-resistance coefficient of 0.10 and equal torque sharing. At 50 ft, an ideal 12-inch feature spans approximately 71 pixels across a full-resolution Camera Module 3 Standard image, while a 1-degree pointing error displaces the ranging ray by approximately 266 mm. An executed synth”
Exact source · revision 1Source owner not reported
Reported quantity · pixel span: 71 other · Basis not reported
“compliance with an 8 km/h design ceiling. A steady 20-degree climb requires at least 1.255 newton-meters per wheel under an assumed rolling-resistance coefficient of 0.10 and equal torque sharing. At 50 ft, an ideal 12-inch feature spans approximately 71 pixels across a full-resolution Camera Module 3 Standard image, while a 1-degree pointing error displaces the ranging ray by approximately 266 mm. An executed synth”
Exact source · revision 1Source owner not reported
Evidence dependency changes (3)
- 2026-10-30T19:04:08.014Z · evidence updated · source revision 1. Evidence extraction was updated; current source attributions are shown above.
- 2026-10-30T18:25:15.233Z · evidence updated · source revision 1. Evidence extraction was updated; current source attributions are shown above.
- 2026-10-30T17:37:36.781Z · evidence updated · source revision 1. Evidence extraction was updated; current source attributions are shown above.
Report timeline
Follow attributed reports and material updates.
- arXiv Robotics — research abstractsSignalFour-Wheel Rover Design with Packet-Commanded Imaging and LiDAR Ranging Analysis
Study presents an integrated rover design for NASA competition, analyzing mobility, sensor geometry, and command execution without physical trials. Software benchmarks and analytical models support reproducible verification.
Event coverage history
There is not enough continuous observation data to show a trend.
Timezone · UTC
Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).