Skip to content
Trending eventDeveloping

E2DRL: End-to-End Differentiable Reinforcement Learning for 3D Obstacle Avoidance in Quadruped Robots

1 reports1 reporting sourcesUpdated 10 hours ago

Overview

Event synthesis

E2DRL, a differentiable reinforcement learning framework for quadruped obstacle avoidance, achieves higher sample efficiency and sim-to-real validation on Unitree Go2 using SAPO and DAgger distillation with terrain-aware gating.

Generated from attributed reports · Updated 1 hours ago

Event evidence and corrections

0 attributed source owners. Ownership does not establish independent confirmation. Quantities are reported separately and are never added together.

Environment: simulation
Supporting report

“n a differentiable simulator is distilled into a recurrent depth-based student via DAgger, then blended with a base locomotion policy using a terrain-aware gating module for deployment. In simulation, E2DRL achieves higher sample efficiency than PPO and demonstrates superior velocity-tracking performance and 3D obstacle-avoidance capability compared with both PPO and Duality-based DCBF NMPC. We present the first sim-”

Exact source · revision 1

Source owner not reported

Report timeline

Follow attributed reports and material updates.

10/15
  1. arXiv Robotics — research abstracts
    E2DRL: End-to-End Differentiable Reinforcement Learning for 3D Obstacle Avoidance in Quadruped Robots

    This research proposes E2DRL, a differentiable reinforcement learning framework for 3D obstacle avoidance in quadruped robots. The method uses a soft obstacle-interaction formulation with velocity-conditioned stop-gradient shaping to provide first-order gradients for training. A privileged teacher trained via SAPO is distilled into a depth-based student using DAgger, and integrated with a terrain-aware gating module for deployment. The approach achieves higher sample efficiency and better performance in simulation compared to PPO and DCBF NMPC, with the first sim-to-real validation on a Unitree Go2 robot.

Event coverage history

There is not enough continuous observation data to show a trend.

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).