Skip to content
Trending eventHistorical event

$\mathcal{C}^\infty$ Smooth Trajectory Planning with Application to Soft Robots

1 reports1 reporting sourcesUpdated 5 days ago

Overview

Event synthesis

This paper presents a trajectory planning method that generates infinitely differentiable paths ($\mathcal{C}^\infty$) to ensure high motion performance and avoid structural vibrations in soft continuum robots. The approach generalizes existing smoothness requirements (such as $\mathcal{C}^4$ for collaborative robots and $\mathcal{C}^5$ for drones) and ensures continuous derivatives including velocity, acceleration, jerk, snap, crackle, pop, etc., even under null boundary conditions where all derivatives at start and end are zero. The method was verified and evaluated through simulations and hardware experiments.

Generated from attributed reports · Updated 5 days ago

Event evidence and corrections

0 attributed source owners. Ownership does not establish independent confirmation. Quantities are reported separately and are never added together.

No current evidence-backed claims. Missing information remains not reported.

Report timeline

Follow attributed reports and material updates.

11/5
  1. arXiv Robotics — research abstractsSignal
    $\mathcal{C}^\infty$ Smooth Trajectory Planning with Application to Soft Robots

    This paper presents a trajectory planning method that generates infinitely differentiable paths ($\mathcal{C}^\infty$) to ensure high motion performance and avoid structural vibrations in soft continuum robots. The approach generalizes existing smoothness requirements (such as $\mathcal{C}^4$ for collaborative robots and $\mathcal{C}^5$ for drones) and ensures continuous derivatives including velocity, acceleration, jerk, snap, crackle, pop, etc., even under null boundary conditions where all derivatives at start and end are zero. The method was verified and evaluated through simulations and hardware experiments.

Event coverage history

Current attention 3·Peak within the comparable range 10(2026-11-05 06:00 UTC)·Change within the comparable range over 24 hours -49%

02.557.5102026-11-0506:002026-11-0521:002026-11-0613:002026-11-0704:00

The trend compares participants observed continuously; its scope may be narrower than current attention totals. Hover or click to explore hourly observations, or use the left and right arrow keys.

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).