Skip to content
Trending eventWatching

ColNav: Uncertainty-Aware Spacetime Collision Checking with Bounding Volume Hierarchies

1 reports1 reporting sourcesUpdated 2 days ago

Overview

Event synthesis

This paper introduces ColNav, a robust collision checking method for mobile robots that encodes uncertainty into spacetime tubes organized via bounding volume hierarchies. The approach handles both bounded-set and Gaussian uncertainty descriptions, unifies static and dynamic obstacles, and achieves a 100% success rate under prediction model mismatch compared to 65% for the best baseline while maintaining up to three times the clearance in dense traffic; real-time operation on a physical robot is also validated.

Generated from attributed reports · Updated 9 hours ago

Event evidence and corrections

0 attributed source owners. Ownership does not establish independent confirmation. Quantities are reported separately and are never added together.

Reported quantity · Reported success rate: 100 percent · Basis not reported
Supporting report

“ers the entire horizon, rather than testing sampled time instants, and returns a robust geometric certificate together with an estimate of the time to collision. Static and dynamic obstacles share the same representation. Our approach reaches the goal with a 100% success rate under prediction model mismatch, where the best baseline reaches 65%, and maintains up to three times the clearance in dense traffic. We also v”

Exact source · revision 1

Source owner not reported

Report timeline

Follow attributed reports and material updates.

11/10
  1. arXiv Robotics — research abstractsSignal
    ColNav: Uncertainty-Aware Spacetime Collision Checking with Bounding Volume Hierarchies

    This paper introduces ColNav, a robust collision checking method for mobile robots that encodes uncertainty into spacetime tubes organized via bounding volume hierarchies. The approach handles both bounded-set and Gaussian uncertainty descriptions, unifies static and dynamic obstacles, and achieves a 100% success rate under prediction model mismatch compared to 65% for the best baseline while maintaining up to three times the clearance in dense traffic; real-time operation on a physical robot is also validated.

Event coverage history

There is not enough continuous observation data to show a trend.

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).