Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Subhransu S. Bhattacharjee, Dylan Campbell, Rahul Shome·· 6 days agoSignalEditorial score75

FlatLands: Indoor floormap completion from a single egocentric view

FlatLands: Indoor floormap completion from a single egocentric view

Summary

This paper introduces FlatLands, a dataset and benchmark for single-view indoor floor-map completion. It contains 270,575 observations from 17,656 scene records across six metric 3D datasets. The study evaluates eleven models, including deterministic and generative methods, to assess floor-map accuracy and the representation of ambiguity in unseen space without fine-tuning.

Editorial context

The authors introduce FlatLands, a dataset and benchmark comprising 270,575 observations from 17,656 scene records across six metric 3D datasets, designed to evaluate eleven models for single-view indoor floor-map completion in metric bird's-eye view without fine-tuning.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Data origin
Human egocentric dataOpen source S1

Reported numbers

  • observations

    270,575

    View original evidence
    inistic and generative. FlatLands contain 270,575 observations from 17,656 scene records across six metric 3D datasets, with aligned observation, visibility, validity, and ground-truth maps and both in- and out-of-distribution protocols. We compare training-free, deterministic, ensemble, and generative methods on shared geometry-derived inputs and, without fine-tuning, on maps estimated from real egocentric RGB image
    Open source S3
  • datasets

    6

    View original evidence
    inistic and generative. FlatLands contain 270,575 observations from 17,656 scene records across six metric 3D datasets, with aligned observation, visibility, validity, and ground-truth maps and both in- and out-of-distribution protocols. We compare training-free, deterministic, ensemble, and generative methods on shared geometry-derived inputs and, without fine-tuning, on maps estimated from real egocentric RGB image
    Open source S3
  • paper: not_reported

What remains unknown

Dataset licensing and commercial-use rights are not established here.

Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

FlatLands: Indoor floormap completion from a single egocentric view

Open source S1

inistic and generative. FlatLands contain 270,575 observations from 17,656 scene records across six metric 3D datasets, with aligned observation, visibility, validity, and ground-truth maps and both in- and out-of-distribution protocols. We compare training-free, deterministic, ensemble, and generative methods on shared geometry-derived inputs and, without fine-tuning, on maps estimated from real egocentric RGB image

Open source S3

arXiv:2603.16016v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A single egocentric image typically captures only a small portion of the floor, yet a complete metric traversability map of the surroundings would better serve applications such as indoor navigation. We introduce FlatLands, a dataset and benchmark for single-view indoor floor-map completion in metric bird's-eye view (BEV), evaluating eleven models: both determ

Open source S2

s. Our results show that predicting floor almost everywhere can achieve high IoU when most evaluated cells are floor, while generative sample sets outperform the best single-output model under a proper scoring rule and support safer risk-weighted planning. FlatLands establishes a rigorous testbed for evaluating both floor-map accuracy and how effectively alternative completions represent the ambiguity of unseen space

Open source S4

Implications for data suppliers

RoboSignal interpretation and collection questions, not statements of buyer demand.

  • Check whether the intended buyer needs human observations, hand or object annotations, or aligned robot actions. Human video alone does not provide robot commands.
  • Compare the reported units and scope before using these quantities in a budget. Recording hours, sensor-hours and trajectories are different measures.
  • Validate demand and acceptance criteria with a buyer before scaling. Publication, popularity and a research result do not establish a purchase commitment.

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).