OpenZilo: An Open Smart-Ring Platform for Human-Centric Sensing and Interaction with Robots
OpenZilo: An Open Smart-Ring Platform for Human-Centric Sensing and Interaction with Robots
This research introduces OpenZilo, an open smart-ring platform designed to connect user input to timely physical action in robotics.
The study evaluates an open smart-ring platform integrating multiple sensors to support wearable robot interfaces, reporting task success rates of 90.4% for speech and 88.8% for gestures across 250 trials per modality with five commands, alongside physiological-event-triggered interaction latencies.
Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗
Loading article text…
What the source reports
Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.
Reported numbers
Reported success rate
90.4%
Reported trials
View original evidence
n, interaction policy, and robot execution. We characterize seven operating modes and evaluate speech and gesture control with 10 participants. Across five commands and 250 trials per modality, speech and gestures achieved task success rates of 90.4% and 88.8%, respectively. Recognition accuracy exceeded task success for both modalities. Gaussian hidden Markov models achieved higher accuracy than a support vector mac
Open source S3Reported success rate
88.8%
Reported trials
View original evidence
n, interaction policy, and robot execution. We characterize seven operating modes and evaluate speech and gesture control with 10 participants. Across five commands and 250 trials per modality, speech and gestures achieved task success rates of 90.4% and 88.8%, respectively. Recognition accuracy exceeded task success for both modalities. Gaussian hidden Markov models achieved higher accuracy than a support vector mac
Open source S3robot notification-receipt-to-arrival time
11.71
View original evidence
hine across three vocabulary sizes, with longer scoring times. Following a shared spoken task start, gesture-based adjustments had shorter median response times than speech. Whole-task success was 70.0% with gestures and 64.0% with speech. We further examine physiological-event-triggered robot interaction using simulated event notifications. Mean notification-receipt-to-arrival times were 11.71 s for the robot and 9.
Open source S4number of trials per modality
250 trials
Reported trials
View original evidence
n, interaction policy, and robot execution. We characterize seven operating modes and evaluate speech and gesture control with 10 participants. Across five commands and 250 trials per modality, speech and gestures achieved task success rates of 90.4% and 88.8%, respectively. Recognition accuracy exceeded task success for both modalities. Gaussian hidden Markov models achieved higher accuracy than a support vector mac
Open source S3
- paper: not_reported
What remains unknown
Not established in the collected evidence: Environment, Control, Data origin.
Reported performance applies to the described task. It does not establish general autonomy or deployment readiness.
Source excerpts and review record
Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.
n, interaction policy, and robot execution. We characterize seven operating modes and evaluate speech and gesture control with 10 participants. Across five commands and 250 trials per modality, speech and gestures achieved task success rates of 90.4% and 88.8%, respectively. Recognition accuracy exceeded task success for both modalities. Gaussian hidden Markov models achieved higher accuracy than a support vector mac
Open source S3
hine across three vocabulary sizes, with longer scoring times. Following a shared spoken task start, gesture-based adjustments had shorter median response times than speech. Whole-task success was 70.0% with gestures and 64.0% with speech. We further examine physiological-event-triggered robot interaction using simulated event notifications. Mean notification-receipt-to-arrival times were 11.71 s for the robot and 9.
Open source S4
Source：arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org