Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Araki Wakiuchi, Hikaru Sasaki, Takamitsu Matsubara·· 1 days agoEditorial score65

quARtet Marker: A 3D-Printable Multi-Tag Fiducial for Robust Near-Frontal Pose Estimation

quARtet Marker: A 3D-Printable Multi-Tag Fiducial for Robust Near-Frontal Pose Estimation

Summary

This research proposes quARtet Marker, a 3D-printable fiducial that uses multiple tilted tags to improve pose estimation for robotic manipulation. The design addresses the limitations of single planar tags in near-frontal views by using tilted tags that maintain perspective cues. Experiments show that the marker reduces mean frontal orientation error and root-mean-square position error significantly, with layouts featuring flat contact strips performing better in graspability tests.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • mean frontal orientation error

    2.18

    View original evidence
    mean frontal orientation error from 2.18 degree for a single planar tag
    Open source S4
  • mean frontal orientation error

    0.24–0.47

    View original evidence
    mean frontal orientation error from 2.18 degree for a single planar tag to 0.24-0.47 degree
    Open source S4
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

fabricated geometry and the detector model. Because tilting consumes flat area, its three layouts trade pose-estimation consistency against graspability. In robot-referenced, same-setup fixed-camera experiments, all three layouts reduced the mean frontal orientation error from 2.18 degree for a single planar tag to 0.24-0.47 degree and the root-mean-square position error from 1.50 to 0.17-0.20 mm. A robot-mounted-cam

Open source S4

era pose-hold test confirmed this separation under closed-loop visual feedback. In swing-down trials under identical conditions, the two layouts with flat contact strips retained the object, whereas the layout without flat strips slipped about a hundred times more than a single planar tag. For the tested conditions, the results support a rule: the layout without flat strips when pose-estimation consistency dominates,

Open source S5

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).