Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Chunru Lin, Hongxin Zhang, Fenghao Yu, Zhehuan Chen, Thomas L. Griffiths, Yejin Choi, David Held, Chuang Gan·· 2 days agoSignalEditorial score75

RoboWits: Unexpected Challenges for Robotic Creative Problem Solving

RoboWits: Unexpected Challenges for Robotic Creative Problem Solving

Summary

This paper introduces RoboWits, a bi-manual robotic benchmark designed to evaluate cognitive reasoning, creative tool use, and robustness to unexpected conditions.

Editorial context

The authors introduce RoboWits, a benchmark using an automated multi-agent pipeline to generate 30 seed tasks and 200 mutated scenarios evaluating cognitive reasoning and robustness in bi-manual robots.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Reported numbers

  • seed tasks curated

    30

    View original evidence
    eline, we curated 30 diverse seed tasks and 200 tasks with mutations and graded difficulty across geometry, material, and assembly-based reasoning. We benchmark popular robot policies, pre-trained VLAs, a zero-shot policy built on a frontier VLM, and oracle-state planners. Our results reveal a significant performance gap: while pre-trained VLAs exhibit preliminary success on seed tasks after fine-tuning, they struggl
    Open source S4
  • mutated tasks curated

    200

    View original evidence
    eline, we curated 30 diverse seed tasks and 200 tasks with mutations and graded difficulty across geometry, material, and assembly-based reasoning. We benchmark popular robot policies, pre-trained VLAs, a zero-shot policy built on a frontier VLM, and oracle-state planners. Our results reveal a significant performance gap: while pre-trained VLAs exhibit preliminary success on seed tasks after fine-tuning, they struggl
    Open source S4
  • seed tasks with mutations

    200

    View original evidence
    eline, we curated 30 diverse seed tasks and 200 tasks with mutations and graded difficulty across geometry, material, and assembly-based reasoning. We benchmark popular robot policies, pre-trained VLAs, a zero-shot policy built on a frontier VLM, and oracle-state planners. Our results reveal a significant performance gap: while pre-trained VLAs exhibit preliminary success on seed tasks after fine-tuning, they struggl
    Open source S4
  • paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

eline, we curated 30 diverse seed tasks and 200 tasks with mutations and graded difficulty across geometry, material, and assembly-based reasoning. We benchmark popular robot policies, pre-trained VLAs, a zero-shot policy built on a frontier VLM, and oracle-state planners. Our results reveal a significant performance gap: while pre-trained VLAs exhibit preliminary success on seed tasks after fine-tuning, they struggl

Open source S4

e to perform on mutated tasks, implying their brittleness in manipulation tasks requiring reasoning, strategy adaptation, and robustness to deceptive or constrained environments. A zero-shot policy built on GPT-6 Astra outperforms all fine-tuned VLAs, yet still loses about a fifth of its success on mutated tasks, showing that stronger foundation models alone do not close the robustness gap. See our project page https

Open source S5

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).