Skip to content
arXiv Robotics — research abstracts· Junjie Zhang, Deteng Zhang, Zhisong Xu, Bo Sun, Liuyang Li, Yihong Tian, Jie Yin·· 11 days agoEditorial score65

Towards Accurate End-Effector Localization for UMI-Style Robotic Manipulation Teaching

Towards Accurate End-Effector Localization for UMI-Style Robotic Manipulation Teaching

Summary

This research introduces MILD, a Manipulation-Interface Localization Dataset, and AprilVINS, a method for accurate end-effector localization in robotic teaching. The dataset includes real-world and simulation sequences, and AprilVINS combines visual-inert, AprilTag geometry, and state optimization to achieve millimeter-level accuracy in TCP-relative localization.

Source: arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · Read original article ↗

Loading article text…

What the source reports

Publisher-reported claims, with original evidence. These results have not been independently verified by RoboSignal.

Data origin
Robot trajectoriesOpen source S3

Reported numbers

  • sensor sequences

    86

    View original evidence
    86 sensor sequences from Insta360 X5 and Insight9
    Open source S3
  • tasks

    15

    View original evidence
    15 repeated tabletop tasks
    Open source S3
  • code: not_reported
  • dataset: not_reported
  • weights: not_reported
  • paper: not_reported
Source excerpts and review record

Automatically extracted; no manual editorial approval recorded.

d and simulation sequences. The real-world subset provides 86 sensor sequences from Insta360 X5 and Insight9 across 15 repeated tabletop tasks, calibration assets, and a per-execution robot end-effector reference trajectory. The simulation subset, MILD-Sim, extends task coverage in Isaac Sim for controlled manipulation-replay studies. Benchmarking visual-inertial and fiducial-aided systems on instrumented real-world

Open source S3

AprilTag4 recordings, AprilVINS(full) under a unified protocol with sequence-specific profiles reaches millimeter-level SE(3)-aligned TCP-relative APE RMSE with high time completion and lower reported error than the tested routes under their respective protocols, whereas fisheye VIO without tag factors remains at centimeter scale. Ablations separate accuracy from exportability, and a MILD-Sim replay study provides t

Open source S5

Implications for data suppliers

RoboSignal interpretation and collection questions, not statements of buyer demand.

  • Match the buyer’s robot embodiment, action space, sensors and timestamp requirements before planning collection.
  • Compare the reported units and scope before using these quantities in a budget. Recording hours, sensor-hours and trajectories are different measures.
  • Validate demand and acceptance criteria with a buyer before scaling. Publication, popularity and a research result do not establish a purchase commitment.

Source:arXiv Robotics — research abstracts · arxiv.org

Timezone · UTC

Article dates follow your selected timezone. Briefing editions use Hong Kong time (UTC+8).